Choice of infill is bordering on irrelevant on the concern I was trying to cover.
Regards acceleration, dynamic acceleration adjust, and instant speed settings they are determined by my personal tolerance to artefacts such as ghosting and ringing.
Rephrased; when a path or geometry type has no potential of reaching the requested speed are there detrimental effects to be expected from the constant cycle of jerk, acceleration, deceleration, jerk, repeat? In order for the material metering to be accurate how far are your margins for the setting of pressure advance, extrusion corrections, extrusion multiplier? (Edit: Are you reducing the tolerance on suitable setting values for your parameters before you start to see detrimental build issues)
Regards simulation it isn't accurate for me. See one of my other threads. However, I would hope that whatever the error is in the simulation or print I would be able to scale back the infill speed and note at what point the simulation time increases.
So predicting what speeds are attainable based on instant speeds and acceleration values is fairly straight forward. Is there an easy way of calculating how much steady velocity would be needed for the pressure advance to stabilise after acceleration before needing to adjust for the oncoming deceleration?