Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    iHSV42-40-05-24 Servo motors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    4
    6
    502
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BlueKTXundefined
      BlueKTX
      last edited by

      iHSV42-40-05-24 Servo motors

      does anyone knows how ti connect this type of servo motor to a Duet 3 board

      http://www.jmc-motor.com/product/977.html

      thank you

      mrehorstdmdundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fcwiltundefined
        fcwilt
        last edited by

        Hi,

        Interesting.

        What is the advantage of a servo based system over closed loop steppers?

        Thanks.

        Frederick

        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • alankilianundefined
          alankilian
          last edited by

          Without a manual, it's impossible to tell how to hook it up.

          SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mrehorstdmdundefined
            mrehorstdmd @BlueKTX
            last edited by

            @BlueKTX I used them with the Duet 2 board. I used the expansion board to get the step/direction/enable signals for the motors. The expansion board drives the motors directly, without any level shifters or other screwing around.

            @fcwilt The advantage of servos over steppers is much higher torque especially at high speeds, and much smoother, quieter operation. Whether you need extra high speed and acceleration are up to you. Steppers usually go fast enough for 3D printing, but plotters and pick and place machines can go much faster.

            I used the 78W version of those motors in my sand table and it easily drives the very high friction corexy mechanism up to 2000 mm/sec with acceleration as high as 15000 mm/sec^2 (yes, about 1.5G). It could go much faster if I used larger drive pulleys and beefier power supplies. Servos will suck as much current as required to keep up with the input signal, so you need beefy power supplies to really make them fly. I used a 150W and 200W power supplies to power the motors in the sand table.

            sand table

            I swapped the servos into my 3D printer and ran some tests and the results weren't good (salmon skin all over the print indicating insufficient resolution), but someone else here used them with 3:1 reduction and got great results in a 3D printer. There are about a million parameters to tweak in the drivers, but little information to guide the tweaking, so it might be possible to improve the resolution without resorting to gear/pulley reduction, but I don't know how to do it. The spec says they have a 1000 line encoder, but it's hall effect type which isn't the same as a 1000 line optical encoder that probably would provide sufficient resolution.

            https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-spice-must-flow-gets-servo-motors.html
            https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/2020/04/ihsv-servomotor-information.html
            https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/2020/11/heres-what-happened-when-i-swapped.html

            https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @mrehorstdmd
              last edited by

              @mrehorstdmd

              Thanks for the information on the performance of servos.

              I watched the video on the sand table but I was unable to discern the purpose of the device.

              Does it produce something useful or is it for entertainment?

              Frederick

              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              mrehorstdmdundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mrehorstdmdundefined
                mrehorstdmd @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt At this point it's just for entertainment. I'm exploring the possibility of preserving the patterns by using a "sand" like plaster or cement and then misting the finished pattern with water or cyanoacrylate and letting it set. The resulting "tile" could be used to add texture to walls, floors, etc.

                Like many others, my sand table started with steppers, but I wanted higher speed. As I cranked up the speed, the steppers made more and more noise, so I tried the servos which exceeded all expectations for speed and noise level. As far as I can tell, I was the first to apply servomotors to a sand table build. If you look around the web at other sand table videos, everyone else's time lapse videos look about like my real time videos. Most people run the tables at 30-50 mm/sec in order to minimize stepper noise (you also get a bit more detailed patterns when the ball isn't throwing the sand as it moves!). My table can routinely run at 40x that speed without the motors even getting warm. At 500 mm/sec my table is about as quiet as a stepper driven table running at 50 mm/sec.

                https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • First post
                  Last post
                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA