• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

3.3rc1 Polar Kinematic issue.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
Beta Firmware
2
8
482
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Phospherus
    last edited by Phospherus 5 Feb 2021, 08:43 2 May 2021, 08:42

    @dc42 This is an update to the Polar issue we spoke of in the other thread.

    I am getting a waviness on straight lines with the 3.3 Betas and the RC1, Firmware 3.2.2 is the newest that I do not see an issue.

    The following is with the same Gcode file.

    This is with the latest 3.3rc1 that DC42 linked to on Dropbox.

    20210502_042400.jpg

    This is 3.2.2 just to show that it is not a mechanical issue.

    20210502_043459.jpg

    These were done back to back for comparison and on Genuine Duet Ethernet 2.

    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 May 2021, 09:09 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      dc42 administrators @Phospherus
      last edited by 2 May 2021, 09:09

      @phospherus please send M669 without parameters to check the segmentation settings.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      undefined 2 Replies Last reply 2 May 2021, 09:17 Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Phospherus @dc42
        last edited by 2 May 2021, 09:17

        @dc42

        M669
        Kinematics is Polar with radius 0.0 to 120.0mm, homed radius 0.3mm, segments/sec 100, min. segment length 0.20

        I checked both firmware versions this output above is the same.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Phospherus @dc42
          last edited by 4 May 2021, 03:56

          @dc42

          Are these ok for segments/sec or do you see an issue?

          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 4 May 2021, 09:28 Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by dc42 5 Apr 2021, 08:43 4 May 2021, 08:43

            @phospherus thos segmentation value look OK to me. In the first image you posted, what is the approximate length of each wave; and what was the printing speed? It looks to me that the firmware was not using the configured segmentation settings but was using much larger segments instead.

            Did you try 3.3beta1, and if so, did that version show the same problem as the later betas?

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              dc42 administrators @Phospherus
              last edited by 4 May 2021, 09:28

              @phospherus, I think I have found the bug. I will fix it in 3.3RC2. Meanwhile, I think a workaround would be to send M669 T0.2 (later than your main M669 command) or alternatively add parameter T0.2 to your existing M669 command.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              undefined 2 Replies Last reply 4 May 2021, 10:15 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Phospherus @dc42
                last edited by 4 May 2021, 10:15

                @dc42

                Thank you for the info. Will reload 3.3 RC1 and try the fix and will let you know.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Phospherus @dc42
                  last edited by 9 May 2021, 01:47

                  @dc42

                  Confirmed that issue is fixed with the provided work around. Thank you

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  7 out of 8
                  • First post
                    7/8
                    Last post
                  Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA