M568 - Changes in Behavior
-
I've noticed in the gcode dictionary that
M568
will be the preferred method to set temps going forward. I have a suggestion to make this command more comprehensive. Currently there are too many ways to set temps andM568
could be more comprehensive to consolidate things a bit more.-
It would be nice if we could add a
W
parameter to wait for temps instead of following the command withM116
. The existing behavior doesn't incentivize using this command overM104
orM109
. It's not any cleaner. -
It would be nice if this command would include parameters for the bed heater.
M568
is an easy way to set and activate standby and active temps for the nozzle, and the bed needs the same ability other thanM140
.
-