• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

rr_status?type=XXX additional info

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Duet Web Control
2
4
491
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    flyinchinchy
    last edited by 6 Apr 2019, 13:27

    Hi, i have recently been playing around with the JSON data from the duet wifi to make some active progress indicators on my enclosure through wifi and i was wondering how much of a task it would be to add the current tool temperature into the status request? i might just be being stupid so any help would be appreciated but i can easily grab the current bed temperature and target temperature but when it comes to the tool i can only find the target temperature readout

    Here is an example of a type 3 request from the wiki

    "temps": {
    "bed": { // Missing
    "current": 20.0, // if no
    "active": -273.1, // heated
    "state": 0 // bed
    }, // is present
    "chamber": { // Missing
    "current": 19.7, // if no
    "active": 50.0, // chamber was
    "state": 2 // previously defined
    }, // using M141 H#
    "heads": {
    "current": [25.0, 25.0],
    "active": [0.0, 0.0],
    "standby": [0.0, 0.0],
    "state": [2, 1] // 0: off, 1: standby, 2: active, 3: fault (same for bed)
    },
    "tools": { // New in RRF 1.19. This reflects the set tool temperatures
    "active": [[0.0], [0.0]],
    "standby": [[0.0], [0.0]]
    }

    cheers

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      resam
      last edited by 6 Apr 2019, 13:38

      type 1 contains them as list under .temps.current.
      Usually first and second entry are your bed and hotend.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        flyinchinchy
        last edited by 6 Apr 2019, 13:42

        ahhh, i see it now! it seems a bit of out place there no? i imagine it would be better suited amongst the other tool values? thank you for the help though

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          flyinchinchy
          last edited by 6 Apr 2019, 13:43

          actually i take that back, i can see how it is formatted now, just my browser was making them look weird. my bad

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          2 out of 4
          • First post
            2/4
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA