Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Volcano hitting extruder limit?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    8
    40
    6.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • minimundefined
      minim
      last edited by

      He seems to have similar experience as me.. 0.5-0.6 layer height on a 0.8 nozzle and he get's problem with layer adhesion and extrusion if going above 30mm/s. Guess it's really the extrusion limit of the volcano then. I might swap down to a 0.6 nozzle then to get back some detail and then I can prolly up the speed to 60 again.,

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • WalterSKWundefined
        WalterSKW
        last edited by

        I just did some tests with a 100x100x5mm thing. Settings : 210°C, 0,8mm nozzle, 100mm speed set up in S3D for all printing. Layer width 0,96mm, height 0,64mm.
        I made a quick and dirty video with of course some troubles in feeding the filament.
        I played with the speed. and ended up with 70% as a speed where there was still a nice track. 70% of 100mm/s = 70mm/s.
        Here is the video (sorry for the quality. I'm not a professional 😞 )
        https://youtu.be/Fh8iMHWGRcM

        I would NOT use any paste to improve heat conductivity between nozzle and block. What you could do (and what I did) is applying some copperpaste (used for cars : brakes) between heater cartridge and block. This has also the advantage that the heater can still be removed without issues when needed.

        Brian once said: "Always look at the bright side of life"
        Works for me!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • minimundefined
          minim
          last edited by

          Hmm I did some testing now after seeing this. I had my speed set at 30mm/s and even then it was slightly under extruding with 0.4 layer height and 0.96 width.. Had to drop to 80% before it got perfect. I then upped to 250% and it didn't skip steps but it was heavy under extruding. I'm going to test with a bigger new nozzle now to see if it could be partly clogged or smt.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • minimundefined
            minim
            last edited by

            qube 40x40mm printed at 30mm/s with 1.0nozzle and 1.2 layer width, 0.8 layer height gives me no under extrusion. This was a layer time at 47seconds so 1280mm^3/47 is 27mm^3/s if i calc correctly. INSANE amount lol. It's rough print but def not under extrusion. Going to 130% speed it started to under extrude and making bad corners/adhesion. So then I can get over 27mm/3 with 1nozzle. Should be possible to break the 10-15 barriere on 0.8 then. Must be some kind of block in the nozzle, can't think of anything else..

            Edit redid math…

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • minimundefined
              minim
              last edited by

              And new test with 0.6 nozzle where I had 60mm/s speed (slowed to 60% for outer petimeter) I had a extrusion rate of 15mm^3/s with perfect extrusion width. 5-6 more than I can do with a 0.8 nozzle so there must be something fishy with that nozzle. When I pushed up to 18mm^s (35sec layer time 40x40x0.4) it started under extruding also but then i'm close to what people say is the volcano limit again.

              Can my 0.8 nozzle become partly clogged?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DjDemonDundefined
                DjDemonD
                last edited by

                Maybe there is a bur inside it or the shaping down to the nozzle orifice is incorrect, or the nozzle isn't really 0.8mm. What diameter filament does it extrude into the air? Good rule of thumb is to allow 20% die swell so a 0.8 should extrude 1.0mm width into the air give or take. Order up another nozzle?

                Definitely use copper grease between nozzle and block, it does improve conductivity and helps dismantling.

                I think you'll be right about the 50w heater, I expect I'll probably end up limiting it to 80% pwm anyway, so probably not worth the bother, but I'll give it a try see whether it makes any difference.

                Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • minimundefined
                  minim
                  last edited by

                  Just a thought, wouldn't it be nice to see extrusion volume and heater PWM in the WEB UI? Wish it was possible to select that instead of voltage for example.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators
                    last edited by

                    You might like to add that to the DWC wish list.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DjDemonDundefined
                      DjDemonD
                      last edited by

                      Extrusion volume would be interesting to monitor, though easy to show for a layer, but might need to be averaged for instantaneous as it will bounce around a lot especially on small details.

                      I wonder if it might be possible to build a modular control panel in DWC so you could add in whatever parameter you wanted to see displayed. Almost like a obdII car monitoring app/hud.

                      Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                      www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                      PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • minimundefined
                        minim
                        last edited by

                        That sounds like a great idea. Im sure there allready is a lof it internal variables that could be interesting to some while debugging. I agreed that it might have to be estimated by layer height after its printed to het it exact but instant value on bigger testpieces wouldnt go that much up/down. Maybe this should be put on the wishlist if its not only me geeking out here ^^

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA