Compilation of RRF2.05.1 in 2022

[Arplyu]

Hi, our little company still uses RRF2.05.1 in our printers. We have been using precompiled binaries so far. Now we need now to make small changes in the basic code.

Unlike the 3.x family, it turned out to be a more complicated task, since there are no specific version tags in other projects than the main RRF, at least if I'm not missing anything. By trials and errors, I found such a combination of commits, which is compiled without errors. Can anybody confirm if this more or less corresponds to the original precompiled binary from release 2.05.1, or how can I check that?

CoreNG: 55dfcf0441adf01ab7bc2ae6a638e395ef018595, 10.12.2019, 17:09:25
FreeRTOS: 83d87c0f61618f5a471f2d52ca75590d67c7a616, 25.01.2020, 13:55:26
RRFLibraries: c3b754a423ce8eb67958c77a8afe54fc5755ae15, 6.01.2020, 22:13:13
RepRapFirmware: eec61ee0d5df8d3b4b556e8854216cee2038f045, tag "2.05.1", 9.02.2020, 13:41:34

Thank you

[dc42]

@arplyu if those are the last commits to those projects prior to the release 2.05.1 on 9 Feb 2020 then they are likely to be the correct ones. I note that there are more recent commits to the dev branch of CoreNG in that time frame, specifically 3c9786121d0bb859ca9869d385f4e519d2757874; so you might like to try that one.

[Arplyu]

@dc42 Thank you for the reply! My main concerns were about RRFLibraries, because in there the commits made between 6 Jan and 9 Feb (the date of main RRF project's tag 2.05.1) are not compilable =( So the question is, could it be so that those changes were not included in the official binary, or am I missing something else.

[dc42]

@arplyu what errors message do you see when you try to compile those commits of RRFLibraries?

[Arplyu]

@dc42 Sorry for the late response, I've needed to switch to some other tasks. Will come back to the topic within two weeks, and if you'll be able to continue then - it would be great! Thank you. Artem