Duet Slicer Integration?

burtoogle

Interesting to hear about Cura’s Multi-core utilization. Do you know if that’s used in the actual geometric processing of the STL layers?

Yes, a lot of the processing is done using parallel constructs that make use of all the available CPU cores. The GPU (if any) is not used by the backend, it's only used for the UI.

Danal

Serious question here, not challenging... just curious:

What is the use case for slicing on the printer? Octoprint has had this forever and I've never used it. I just don't "get it".
Genuinely curious what workflow this helps, etc?

Are there circumstances where I am going to submit a print starting with an STL, and I'm originating on a device that doesn't slice?

Phones/Tablets don't strike me as good places to be manipulating STLs...? Nearly anything else, where I would actually be working with STLs, such as a Windows PC, Mac, Linux... They all run slicers better than the Pi or whatever that's on the printer. Yes? No?

Why would I be more willing to try to tweak slicer settings remotely? Why not directly tweak the slicer on my originating device?

It is pretty rare for me to open a slicer, slice, and go, without changing a setting or two and re-slicing several times. I use S3D, Cura, and Slic3rPE on a regular basis and I find this to be true of all three.

Performance?

It is hard for me to see a use case where the Pi is anywhere near the speed of whatever submitted the STL to the Pi.

What am I missing? What is a frequent/common use case for this?

TLAS

@Danal
For me, there would be 2 major draws:

A decent, open, modern UI. Web technologies trump pretty much everything out there in terms of usibility, ease of programming, and potential for future expansion.
2). Workflow automation. I’m not sure I’m like the average user here or not, but as an Engineer, I work in native CAD design tools and have to export to STL, then open a slicer interface, slice the object, upload it to the Duet, then print. With a server directly connected to the Duet (which only happens to be on the pi here), you could plug the CAD software directly to the PI server and have a 1-click(ish) print capability. Leveraging pieces of a nice flexible web interface to debug any setup also helps streamline.

Also, to piggy back on the cloud comments earlier - if Duet were to create a cloud service, it could start to leverage machine learning and AI to predict failed part geometries and/or optimize component placing and slicing automatically. Let alone begin to gather interesting data like printer calibration over time, better time estimation for prints, and common configuration errors or buggy code. It really opens the doors to a lot of future capabilities beyond the silo’d machine approach.

I do agree that just using the pi as a slicer because you can isn’t that much a benefit. Thinking it’s more about what you can wrap around it.

A Former User

@TLAS said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

2). Workflow automation

Select part in Fusion 360, Make -> 3D print. That sends the .stl file to the selected slicer software, verify settings and click print; off it goes to the Duet and start working.

For some reason they moved the Make button off to a new "Tools" toolbar, so that adds a click, but apart from the time it takes to initially load the external slicer* its hard to improve the workflow unless you always use the same material and same slicer settings.

*) which if you avoid Cura, isn't a big factor.

A Former User

@TLAS said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

Workflow automation. I’m not sure I’m like the average user here or not, but as an Engineer, I work in native CAD design tools and have to export to STL, then open a slicer interface, slice the object, upload it to the Duet, then print. With a server directly connected to the Duet (which only happens to be on the pi here), you could plug the CAD software directly to the PI server and have a 1-click(ish) print capability. Leveraging pieces of a nice flexible web interface to debug any setup also helps streamline.

That I can understand, but there is also the other side of the coin.

As an engineering educator we use the multiple steps you mention specifically to get the junior engineers to be able to "switch" their brains to be able to accomplish the workflow tasks using different software systems on purpose.

I'm all for tools to be used to streamline the process but if you unable to use/understand each "subsystem" on its own, we feel it (in our area) that if you make it too simple there is a lesser understanding of how the nuts and bolts of the process works.

dc42

I think we will see the introduction of cloud-based slicing soon. Then you will be able to use a tablet to control the slicing, or even a smartphone. The Duet will log in to your cloud account and download the GCode file.

A Former User

@dc42

That's a scary thought, while I find it interesting, my concern would be the risk of exposing the duet and possibly other hardware to the outside world unless a high level of network security was properly implemented.

A Former User

Doesn't have to be scary, just optional.

A Former User

@bearer

exactly, as long as it is.....

T3P3Tony

Cloud connectivity would definitely be optional - I share the security concerns, and just because we now running an SBC on duet 3 the advice to not put it on the public internet (or large intranet) has not changed.

Where i see cloud connectivity being used initially is with services which add value that some people don't get from a normal slicer. that might be ease of use, or more advanced features or something. For the majority of current Duet users i think having control of all the steps will be preferred. Time will tell!

Danal

All (or nearly all) of the "workflow is why" replies seem to ignore the fact that the slicer almost always requires some tweaking and re-slicing. At least for me.

Therefore, let me turn that into a question: Is it really true that a lot of people are just "clicking through" the sequence: Load an STL, slice it, save the gcode, without changing a single parameter in the slicer? Or even re-arranging things on the stage? I can see this in a big production shop; easily see this. But hobbyist people? "Just" workflow? That's pretty impressive.

The "cloud is why" and/or "ecosystem is why", those I kinda get. Kind of.

I still don't entirely get the "use a tablet or phone" idea though.... where did the STL come from? Cloud storage? OK, so any browser device. Perhaps you guys are looking more to the future, and that's great, I just don't see it yet.

And last:

@TLAS said in Duet Slicer Integration?:
... you could plug the CAD software directly to the PI server...

...you could plug the CAD software directly to the slicer on your MAC/PC just as easily (if not more easily). And, most of the major 'desktop' slicers have plug-ins for sending to Duet. This is super easy and very effective. I'd be really hinky about an "outside my local lan" service being able to send things to my printer. I do see "ease the workflow", fewer clicks, smoother, etc. I don't see that moving the slicer particularly helps this. In fact, it may hinder it.

And, just to be clear, I'm not at all opposed to this happening for the people who want it. I'm really just figuring out how to make beneficial use of it, for me. Because, you know, its always all about me.

TLAS

@T3P3Tony
@Danal

FYI, just ran a benchmark on the PI and my desktop machine. I used 3DBenchy as the stl object.

Desktop: 3.775 seconds
Ubuntu on Windows, slic3r compiled on device
16 GB Ram
Intel i7 6700K (Quad Core) Overclocked to 4.5 GHz (4.00 GHz base)

Raspberry Pi 4: 25.085 seconds
Raspbian, slic3r compiled on device
4 GB Ram
Cortex-A72 (ARM v8, Quad Core) 1.5GHz

Slicing Time Difference: 6.6x slower
CPU Difference: 3x slower

Conclusion:

Architecture differences between the PI and a normal desktop account for an additional ~2x reduction in speed beyond base CPU speed differences.
Actual slicing time on a desktop is trivial
Slicing time on a Pi 4 is within usable bounds
Slicing directly on the Pi may be faster than switching programs to a separate slicer in some conditions.
Upload time to upload back to the Pi not considererd

TLAS

@T3P3Tony
FYI, I'm planning to eventually integrate slic3r into the Web Control. In my use case, I need to run a slightly modified version of slic3r, and embedding it directly on the Pi seems like the easiest option.

I also think embedding a local application running on the windows machine outside of the browser would be ideal (say a node.js instance) so the slicing can be run on the users local machine without requiring the user to exit from the web interface and the communication can all happen on the back end.

garyd9

I have to agree with @Danal here. It just doesn't make sense to me to just print a STL. We're not talking about a word processing document that is going to look almost identical no matter what printer or ink is used, and consumer 3D printing technology isn't to a point where we can have 2-3 generic presets (draft/normal/HQ) that work for everything.

To me, slicing is an interactive part of the workflow where I make decisions based on the specific printer, the specific filament, the specific model, the use case of the print, and even things like the weather (because I might want less part cooling fan if it's cold.)

Yes, I have some "presets" that I use as a starting point, but I almost always tweak those presets for specific prints. (I hate that programs like "cura" promote using only presets when they hide "advanced" settings by default.) The interaction of making a change and then previewing the change is valuable to me for making some decisions: Should I use tree supports or normal supports? Should I change the extrusion width a bit so there aren't gaps in thin parts? How will the slicer handle this flaw in the STL?

I'll admit that that the slicing technologies are getting better and moving closer to a point where a lot of decisions can be made automatically (for example, dynamic layer heights), but we aren't there yet...

Danal

@garyd9 said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

To me, slicing is an interactive part of the workflow

Exactly. Well phrased.

DocTrucker

Regards speed when slicing is done on the PI the only requirement on speed is that it can prepare data faster than the machine can print it. I've been looking to run Slic3r from the command line for some time so I can get better control over the process, and prepare better ecperimental arrays. I don't need to see the gcode, but previewing slices would still be useful.

At the moment the preparing gcode in advance feels like a hang over from slow processor and limited ram days. If you slice the same stl file, with the same control variables twice you will get identical results. Therefore all I need is the variable set, the stls, and their orientation in the workspace.

Your not seeing the raw control set with gcode anyway, it is still a middle man with much mangling and further processing by the duet.

DocTrucker

@TLAS said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

Desktop: 3.775 seconds
Ubuntu on Windows, slic3r compiled on device
16 GB Ram
Intel i7 6700K (Quad Core) Overclocked to 4.5 GHz (4.00 GHz base)

Raspberry Pi 4: 25.085 seconds
Raspbian, slic3r compiled on device
4 GB Ram
Cortex-A72 (ARM v8, Quad Core) 1.5GHz

Fastest I've heard of benchys being printed was around 15 minutes at the East Coast Reprap Festival this year. The quality didn't appear what you would use on a day to day basis.

So 900 seconds to print, 25 seconds to slice. This should leave enough head room for running the duet at the same time.

garyd9

@DocTrucker said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

@TLAS said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

Raspberry Pi 4: 25.085 seconds
Raspbian, slic3r compiled on device
4 GB Ram
Cortex-A72 (ARM v8, Quad Core) 1.5GHz

So 900 seconds to print, 25 seconds to slice. This should leave enough head room for running the duet at the same time.

I'm curious what slicing options were selected, and how much of the time spent was actually slicing/processing and how much time was just writing to the sdcard. Slicing isn't a single-pass bottom to top process. Aspects of the "top" of the print impact how the lower levels will be sliced. (For example, supports.) That suggests that printing can't start until after the slicing is completed...

DocTrucker

@garyd9 yes, slicing isn't purely concerned with data that intersects that slice plane, but things like supports can be represented as a surface which is then sliced. I've not dug into the details of how slic3r does it yet.

Danal

@DocTrucker said in Duet Slicer Integration?:

the only requirement on speed is that it can prepare data faster than the machine can print it.

Once again, I'm incredibly impressed that there is NO review in that workflow. Start printing before slicing finishes... man someday I hope to reach that level of expertise in operating a slicer, that I don't even have to glance at its output before the print starts.

If you slice the same stl file, with the same control variables twice you will get identical results. Therefore all I need is the variable set, the stls, and their orientation in the workspace.

This is a non-sequitur. If the STL was sliced before, the gcode exists. Identical stl/control/slice should never be a "time critical" critical path, for example in a shop that prints the same thing 20 times, the gcode should be reused for 2 through 20.