Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Pressure advance causing print failure?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    2
    3
    183
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • guycobb2undefined
      guycobb2
      last edited by

      I have a SeeMeCNC Artemis and have been playing with pressure advance as part of tuning the printer. When printing a simple, two column stringing test with PA enabled the print fails about halfway up (maybe 8mm up). For whatever reason it globs up on the print/nozzle to the point of failure, so I just stop the print. If I disable PA, the print finishes and looks good except for a bit of stringing. The Artemis has a long bowden (~800mm) and I’m using a PA setting of 0.9. I reached the 0.9 setting by using a linear advance K-factor gcode that I edited with the PA commands.

      Any help to figure out what may be happening here is certainly appreciated.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator
        last edited by

        0.9 is very high. The K-factor test I think you're describing isn't a great way of tuning pressure advance.

        Try this instead, start printing the same test with pressure advance disabled and then every few layers increase the PA value and observe the changes.

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • guycobb2undefined
          guycobb2
          last edited by guycobb2

          The bowden alone on the Artemis is roughly 800mm, then the length of the Y connector (dual extruder) leading to the hotend and the hotend path itself..... so total length I’m guessing around 900mm. The K-Factor print is a single layer. It prints 10 lines at different PA values so that you can examine them afterwards and pick the most uniform line. Seemed to be a good test but for whatever reason a simple stringing test model fails every time with PA enabled. It ends ups with excessive filament on the nozzle to the point that it not longer is putting layers down on the model. Turn PA off and rerun same gcode and the model will finish just fine. 🤷🏻‍♂️

          This is essentially the same test I run to find a value.

          https://youtu.be/XXTcI75GWBg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA