Duet Pi Regression - How?

A Former User

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

and an apt remove duetsoftwareframework.

apt remove duet* reprapfirmware is about the same length and oddly more specific. would work with remove and purge for that matter.

Danal

@bearer said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

and an apt remove duetsoftwareframework.

apt remove duet* reprapfirmware is about the same length and oddly more specific. would work with remove and purge for that matter.

Yah, I thought about the nicely structured names. As you said though, if the package changes...

A Former User

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

As you said though, if the package changes...

then it has a greater chance of catching it as duetruntime still doesn't depend on duetsoftwareframework.

and if apt remove duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver reprapfirmware is the alternative then it needs to be updated anyways.

to be honest I have more faith in a * than apt and dependencies defined for the packages should autoremove fail.

Danal

OK, here is a "first draft" that works. Comments welcome:

./DuetRegress.sh 2.1.0
Currently Installed duetsoftwareframework=
Command line argument is requesting duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0
Which has associated reprapfirmware of 2.1.0-1 also known as 3.01-RC9

***********************************************************************************
* Note: The next step will run for a while; the script is (probably) not hung.    *
***********************************************************************************

To regress to DSF version 2.1.0 which is RRF version 3.01-RC9:
1) Backup your files via:
  mkdir ~/duetback
  cp -r /opt/dsf/sd/* ~/duetback
or similar. Verify that the backup worked: 'ls ~/duetback' should show directories: 'filaments firmware gcodes macros sys' or similar.

2) Run this command: (it is long, be sure you get it all on one line)
  sudo apt -y  --allow-downgrades install duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0 duetcontrolserver=2.1.0 duetruntime=2.1.0 duetsd=1.0.6 duettools=2.1.0 duetwebcontrol=2.1.4 duetwebserver=2.1.0 reprapfirmware=2.1.0-1

3) Verify system is running properly, web interface opens, etc

4) If Pi runs, but won't connect to Duet Board, bossa the board
   with the file found at /opt/dsf/sd/sys/Duet3Firmware_MB6HC.bin
   Instructions here:
   https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Getting_Started_With_Duet_3#Section_Updating_Duet_3_main_board_firmware

5) Check files like config.g, macros, etc, and restore as required.

There are no name or other recursion dependencies in the script. Also, I took out the "apt remove" command, I don't believe it is required, apt will just overlay things.

A Former User

i opted for splitting the lines so it can be easy to read and copy, or if piped/backticked its not.

i'd also reconsider the -y bit gives apt a chance to complain if it feels the need.

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ bash rrfdep.sh 3.01-RC9
sudo apt install \
  duetcontrolserver=2.1.0 \
  duetsd=1.0.6 \
  duettools=2.1.0 \
  duetwebserver=2.1.0 \
  duetwebcontrol=2.1.4 \
  reprapfirmware=2.1.0-1 \
  duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0
pi@raspberrypi:~ $

don't think i'll put up the version that resolves it from the reprap firmware version, smells like lots of unnecessary load on servers just to save people looking up a table

Danal

Excellent idea on the lines! I will do that. In fact, I was a bit concerned about line length... not only that, but I'm flattening a 'list' now, all I have to do is not do that.

I go back and forth on the -y. Given that this is intended to be used by people who literally can't even answer the initial "Do you want me to do what you asked? [Y/n]" prompt... well... I'm inclined to leave it in.

re: servers, yeah, this one is entirely local. In fact, it ought to insist on a recent (whatever that means) sudo apt update.

Danal

This post is deleted!

A Former User

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

I go back and forth on the -y. Given that this is intended to be used by people who literally can't even answer the initial "Do you want me to do what you asked? [Y/n]" prompt... well... I'm inclined to leave it in.

you don't get any questions if you have all the packages specified; ~~the one you're missing is (likely) libunwind8 (if there are questions)~~ no idea how that snuck into anything, but the rest holds true..

ref the bottom code block; no -Y and no question (also before libunwind8) https://forum.duet3d.com/post/150402

Danal

Direct copy from your code block; don't know why it is different on your machine and mine.

P.S. Given the name "lib un-wind ate" I was trying to figure out if you were making a bad pun or someting...

 sudo apt install \
>   duetcontrolserver=1.2.3.0 \
>   duetruntime=1.2.3.0 \
>   duetsd=1.0.5 \
>   duettools=1.2.3.0 \
>   duetwebserver=1.2.1.0 \
>   duetwebcontrol=2.0.4-1 \
>   reprapfirmware=1.2.3.0-1 \
>   duetsoftwareframework=1.2.3.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
  duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver
  reprapfirmware
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 8 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 32.2 MB/32.2 MB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.2.3.0' of 'duetsoftwareframework:armhf'.
W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.0.5' of 'duetsd:armhf'.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

Danal

I suspect this message in your install (the other thread) explains the difference:

The following NEW packages will be installed:
  duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver reprapfirmwar

as vs. my:

The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
  duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver
  reprapfirmware

Of course, this could also be it:

W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.2.3.0' of 'duetsoftwareframework:armhf'.
W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.0.5' of 'duetsd:armhf'.

A Former User

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.2.3.0' of 'duetsoftwareframework:armhf'.
W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.0.5' of 'duetsd:armhf'.

that goes away if you remove one of the two package feeds?

A Former User

@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

P.S. Given the name "lib un-wind ate" I was trying to figure out if you were making a bad pun or someting...

to be honest I have no idea where it came from, but it did show up as a dependency and got autoremoved a few times. figured it was something new in the latest version, but seems to be gremlins..

Danal

@bearer said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:

W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.0.5' of 'duetsd:armhf'.

that goes away if you remove one of the two package feeds?

Hmmm... I am removing /etc/apt/sources.list.d/duet3d.list (leaving duet3d-unstable.list) and then running sudo apt update

However, I don't see how that would remove any entries that are already in the apt "database". We'll see in a few min, apt is updating a bunch of raspbian stuff.

Danal

It DID eliminate the warnings.

It still asks the Y/n question. I now believe it really is the "DOWNGRADED".

Danal

Put the stable file back in /etc/apt/sources.list.d

Forgot to run sudo apt update and just ran the long duet install command. No warnings.

Ran sudo apt update

Ran the long install again. Warnings are back. That proves it DOES 'recalc' (or how ever you want to phrase it), based on presence/absence of the '.list' files, even if there are no actual updates.

Cool.

P.S. It asked the [Y/n] on every run. Nothing to do with the warnings, apparently.