• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Duet Web Control
6
32
2.5k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    charames @A Former User
    last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:27

    @bearer Yikes. didn't know... just joined today.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:28 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Phaedrux Moderator
      last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:28

      I'm sure he would have appreciated the attention to detail.

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @charames
        last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:28

        @charames no worries, just don't be surprised when there isn't a reply..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          charames
          last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:44

          I was led to this thread while looking for information on issues related to network latency. It seems Duet is known to have frequent connection drop issues, but most of those threads seem to zone in on WiFi as the culprit. However, I am using a Maestro on a wired link and experience connection drops if I connect over the internet (as opposed to locally on my network). Conclusion: latency seems to play a role. Mine was suitably functional after I played around with the "communication settings" (update interval=800mS). But, then I updated the UI to version 2.0.7 and started seeing disconnects again (this time with a message: “Connection interrupted, attempting to reconnect”). I have tried adjusting the Communication Settings since that worked for version 1.22.6, but no values that I have tried have made it any better. It still works well when connected locally, but the additional latency of the internet makes the connection unusable.

          I can click on the “Revert to DWC1” link and it suddenly works again. My conclusion is that there is something about the 2.0.7 build that is even more latency sensitive than DWC1 was.

          I know this isn't the right thread for this discussion, but "latency" is what brought me here. I'll continue searching.

          ? undefined 2 Replies Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:47 Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @charames
            last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:47

            @charames said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

            Conclusion: latency seems to play a role.

            interesting, poor wifi signal can also result in increased latency

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Phaedrux Moderator @charames
              last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:47

              @charames It may be worth upgrading to RRF 3.1.1 and DWC 3.1.1 to test with recent code. @chrishamm would be the one to understand/explain the latency thing I think?

              Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:52 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                charames @Phaedrux
                last edited by charames 16 Jun 2020, 18:52

                @Phaedrux said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

                RRF 3.1.1 and DWC 3.1.1

                I'll look into that, but I was under the impression that those updates introduced some significant changes that would require that I re-do all of my configs. Maybe its worth doing, but since I ONLY have connection issues as a complaint, I was looking for a solution for that.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:53 Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @charames
                  last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:53

                  @charames said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

                  hose updates introduced some significant changes that would require that I re-do all of my configs.

                  yes-ish but now that 3.1.1 is seemingly stable it'll probably be worth while.

                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:54 Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    Phaedrux Moderator
                    last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:54

                    https://configtool.reprapfirmware.org/Start

                    The configuration tool has support for 3.1.1 now so getting a compatible basic config isn't as complicated as it once was. If you have some more complex features implemented you'd still have to do that manually, but it's generally just some minor syntax changes. The gcode wiki is your friend here. https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode

                    Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 16 Jun 2020, 18:56 Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      charames @A Former User
                      last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:54

                      @bearer Thanks. I think I'll take the leap.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        charames @Phaedrux
                        last edited by 16 Jun 2020, 18:56

                        @Phaedrux You, too... thanks.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined magnets99 referenced this topic 30 Dec 2024, 23:25
                        31 out of 32
                        • First post
                          31/32
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA