Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Indirect Laser Filament Monitor Build

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Filament Monitor
    1
    3
    227
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mitchundefined
      mitch
      last edited by mitch

      I saw this really cool indirect laser filament monitor design on thingaverse and I wanted to build it.

      I have all of my pictures on this website of the build:
      https://www.randoprojects.com/2020/08/15/indirect-laser-filament-monitor/

      Printer: Ender 5 w/ Hemera Direct Drive

      I got very accurate results for periods of time and then others it was just as bad as the traditional direct. I have determined that the carbon fiber is a great medium and the laser picks it up well but the current design doesn't feed the filament straight through so depending on the position of the Hemera it could slip.

      I don't have a CAD system to modify the design. I do think with a mod to add bowden coupler on the output in addition to either a bowden coupler or a a microswitch system on the input side, the feed issue would be resolved and the sensor would be more accurate. It seems the natural curve of the filament can slip on the pulley at certain angles which change as the direct drive moves around.

      IMG_20200814_224015 (1).jpg

      Question:
      When using an indirect sensor approach with the laser the percentage of error will be reported wrong due the the size of the shaft and the extruder pulley being different. I am curious, can the laser sensor be used as a rotating sensor so the L parameter can be used for a correction value?

      Has anyone had good luck with improving performance and consistency with other indirect solutions?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • mitchundefined
        mitch
        last edited by

        Image of the carbon fiber shaft.

        IMG_20200814_222859 (1).jpg

        Image of the mounted PCB
        IMG_20200814_223120.jpg

        I am thinking perhaps a hobbed version of the shaft pulley would be better such as this one:
        https://amzn.to/2Ed1Qez

        Instead of the idler pulley this type of microswitch has a short lever arm and more pressure is required. This could serve as both the idler pulley and the filament out microswitch:
        https://amzn.to/3asXKeB

        Another option would be to sandwich the filament between two hobbed pulleys that are connected by a gear:
        https://amzn.to/3iMtoXn

        Trying to decide if/when to give up on the laser and go to the hall effect style rotating sensor. Thoughts?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • mitchundefined
          mitch
          last edited by

          I have ordered the rotating mag filament monitor but I would still like to see if this laser monitor can be salvaged. I would also really like to see if a small micro switch could be added for the static filament present state.

          I am not great at CAD but this would be the difference.

          • Get rid of the spring and idler pulley
          • Use a geared MK3 style dual extruder
          • A support at the top and bottom to keep the filament straight and reduce slips due to the filament curve
          • Add a micro switch inline (normally open)

          Screenshot 2020-08-22 at 8.01.11 PM.png

          Screenshot 2020-08-22 at 8.00.28 PM.png

          The top gear would use a linear bearing and a stationary 3mm axle based on this assembly:
          https://amzn.to/3hpxzbs

          I could provide the stp file if anyone knows how one might create the enclosure around this concept?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA