• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Tool offset Z ignored

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
General Discussion
4
14
1.9k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Kulitorum
    last edited by 22 May 2017, 23:47

    I am building a IDEX machine with two printheads. One of my heads is 0.4mm higher then the other, but adding that offset to my config.g does nothing.

    Here I have set the offset to 4.6mm to see what would happen, and it seems to be ignored.

    ; Tools
    M563 P0 D0 H1
    M563 P1 D1 H2 X3 ; tool 0 uses extruder drive 0 and heater 1 and maps X to U
    G10 P0 X0 Y0 Z0 ; Set tool 0 axis offsets
    G10 P0 R00 S00 ; Set initial tool 0 active and standby temperatures to 0C
    M563 P1 D1 H2 X3 ; tool 1 uses extruder drive 1 and heater 2 And maps X to U
    G10 P1 X0 Y0 Z4.6 ; Set tool 1 axis offsets
    G10 P1 R00 S00; Set initial tool 1 active and standby temperatures to 0C

    Kulitorum

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      dc42 administrators
      last edited by 23 May 2017, 06:50

      There is a known issue which is that if you change tool and the new tool has a different Z offset, the offset is on taken into account until you send a G0 or G1 command that includes the Z parameter. Is this what you are seeing?

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Kulitorum
        last edited by 23 May 2017, 07:31

        Yes, I guess it is. So it will work if I add z-lifting to my gcode?

        Heres the relevant parts of my gcode - init and head change:

        G90
        M82
        M106 S0
        M140 S60
        M190 S60
        G28 ; home all axes
        G10 P0 R210 S210
        G10 P1 R210 S210
        G92 E0
        G1 E-1.0000 F1800
        G1 Z0.180 F1002
        ; layer 1, Z = 0.18
        T0
        ; tool H0.200 W0.480
        ; skirt
        G1 X128.035 Y135.490 F9000
        G1 E0.0000 F540
        G92 E0
        G1 X128.300 Y135.380 E0.0103 F1635
        …...

        G1 X141.305 Y158.772 E4.7989
        G92 E0
        G1 E0.0000 F600
        ; layer 2, Z = 0.18
        T1
        ; tool H0.200 W0.480
        ; inner perimeter
        G1 X139.180 Y159.180 F9000
        G92 E0
        G1 X130.820 Y159.180 E0.3003 F1628
        G1 X130.820 Y150.820 E0.6006
        G1 X139.180 Y150.820 E0.9009
        ......

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Kulitorum
          last edited by 23 May 2017, 08:14

          I tried this, and that made no difference:

          [init]
          ….....
          ; layer 1, Z = 0.18
          T0
          G91
          G1 Z0.01
          G1 Z-0.01
          G90
          ; tool H0.200 W0.480
          ; skirt
          G1 X128.035 Y135.490 F9000
          G1 Z0.180 F1002
          ......
          G1 X141.305 Y158.772 E4.7989
          G92 E0
          G1 E0.0000 F600
          ; layer 2, Z = 0.18
          T1
          G91
          G1 Z0.01
          G1 Z-0.01
          G90
          ; tool H0.200 W0.480
          ; inner perimeter
          G1 X139.180 Y159.180 F9000
          G92 E0
          G1 X130.820 Y159.180 E0.3003 F1628
          G1 X130.820 Y150.820 E0.6006
          .........

          Any ideas for a workaround?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            Kulitorum
            last edited by 23 May 2017, 08:42

            And now I am doing this, which still does not work:

            G90
            M82
            M106 S0
            M140 S60
            M190 S60
            G28 ; home all axes
            G10 P0 R210 S210
            G10 P1 R210 S210
            M104 S210 T0
            M104 S210 T1
            M109 S210 T0
            M109 S210 T1
            G28
            G92 E0
            G1 E-1.0000 F1800
            G1 Z1.180 F1002
            ; layer 1, Z = 0.18
            T0
            G1 Z0.180
            ; tool H0.200 W0.480
            ; skirt
            G1 X128.035 Y135.490 F9000
            G1 Z0.180 F1002
            ….................
            G1 X141.305 Y158.772 E4.7989
            G92 E0
            G1 E0.0000 F600
            ; layer 2, Z = 0.18
            T1
            G1 Z0.180
            ; tool H0.200 W0.480
            ; inner perimeter
            G1 X139.180 Y159.180 F9000
            G92 E0
            G1 X130.820 Y159.180 E0.3003 F1628
            G1 X130.820 Y150.820 E0.6006
            .............

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Kulitorum
              last edited by 23 May 2017, 11:34

              Am I doing this right - this is what you ment, right? - With the G1 Z# after the tool change?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Kulitorum
                last edited by 23 May 2017, 11:46

                I just realized - the displays claims that the z position is 4.6 when printing with the second head, but the printer is not at z4.6. Again - the firmware seems to think it is at 4.6, only it is not.

                Kulitorum

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Kulitorum
                  last edited by 23 May 2017, 20:54

                  This is worse even….

                  Turns out that if you set offset Z for tool 1 to anything other then 0, that head is always printing at the same z position as the first layer. In my case 0.18mm. So every layer is printed at z=0.18m. At the same time, the displays will always show the Z-offset value, so the display in my case always shows 4.6, but it always prints (every layer) at 0.18.

                  I fixed it with a metal file. My z-offset is now 0 and that works better.

                  BTW, OffsetX is also not used. So I had to calibrate the U axis in homeu.g

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    Michel000
                    last edited by 24 May 2017, 09:29

                    Hi i build a machine with dual x carriage and i had the same problem.

                    what you need to do after a tool change is add G01 Z[current z value] (in absolute coordinates) and it will work fine.
                    i made small script that does this for me. it would be great if we could add
                    this in the toolchange files
                    with a variable for the current z height

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Kulitorum
                      last edited by 24 May 2017, 11:31

                      If you look at my last gcode, is that not exactly what I am doing?

                      Maybe you can post an example gcode? - or parts of it?`

                      Thanks.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        Kulitorum
                        last edited by 13 Jun 2017, 06:02

                        Is there any progress on this?

                        Is it fixed in 1.19?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          MrBlom
                          last edited by 13 Jun 2017, 09:16

                          having same problem any update ?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            dc42 administrators
                            last edited by 13 Jun 2017, 09:19

                            Thanks for reminding me. I'll fix it in beta 7.

                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              Kulitorum
                              last edited by 16 Jun 2017, 21:01

                              Great! Looking forward to it 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA