issues after upgrading to RRF3.2 beta3

dc42

Thanks for the file. I'll ask @chrishamm to take a look.

Marco Bona

@dc42, Thank you. I would like to go into the problem of SBC mode in more detail. If necessary, I remain available to carry out tests

dc42

@Marco-Bona said in issues after upgrading to RRF3.2 beta3:

@dc42, Thank you. I would like to go into the problem of SBC mode in more detail. If necessary, I remain available to carry out tests

@Marco-Bona, I think the issue is that when running with attached SBC, if output is generated inside a while-loop then DSF does not report that output until the entire loop has completed. We found this on Friday but we didn't want to hold up the release any more. Your bed.g file contains several echo commands inside while-loops.

Until this is fixed, the workaround is to use M118 to output the messages instead of echo.

Marco Bona

@dc42, the issues that worry me most are those related to the "Assertion failed" error which is from the downgrade to version 3.1.1 that are bothering me and this "Error: Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC (channel File)" which I cannot understand what it refers to. I look forward to your feedback so that we can correct the mistakes and work in total serenity. I believe that duet boards work properly, unfortunately I have no way to verify the proper functioning of raspberry, I would also be willing to replace it if it may be necessary as many users seem to be not going to give problems. I believe that duet cards work properly, unfortunately I have no way to verify the proper functioning of the raspberry, I would also be willing to replace it if it may be necessary as many users seem to be not going to give problems. Let me know, thank you again.
Marco

dc42

@Marco-Bona said in issues after upgrading to RRF3.2 beta3:

@dc42, the issues that worry me most are those related to the "Assertion failed" error which is from the downgrade to version 3.1.1 that are bothering me and this "Error: Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC (channel File)" which I cannot understand what it refers to.

To be clear: the "Assertion failed" only occurred after you downgraded to 3.1.1. Correct?

I will ask @chrishamm to look at the "Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC" error. When do you see that error? If running a particular macro provokes it, please provide that macro file.

Marco Bona

@dc42, The "Assertion failed" error began to occur with RRF3.2 beta2, then I tried to downgrade to beta 1 and finally to 3.1.1 but in both cases it continued to give problems. I do not understand whether it is a consequence or whether there is any other problem that occurred at that time.
I also tried to format and replace the sd card but nothing changed.
For this error " Error: Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC (channel File)" it seems that it concerns the clean_nozzle.g file that I allege, initially if I remember correctly it was (channel daemon) or something similar. I had to delete the daemon.g file which contained a voltage check because it was repeated every 10 seconds.
Remember that the file clean_nozzle in RRF3.2 has no problem, I am still using it in standalone mode. I check in the morning if with beta3 in standalone mode it creates problems and I let you know.
clean_nozzle.g

dc42

Thanks for providing the file.

The "Assertion failed" errors are a known issue with 3.2beta2 (fixed in beta3) when you use M701 or M702. Do you use those commands?

Marco Bona

@dc42, no, I'm not using them. The behavior is blocking when printing and restarting the SBC.
I'm going to cheer up an old report that I saved myself, I hope it can help.

=== Diagnostics ===
RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 MB6HC version 3.1.1 running on Duet 3 MB6HC v0.6 or 1.0 (SBC mode)
Board ID: 08DJM-956L2-G43S4-6JKF0-3S86T-9A5YD
Used output buffers: 1 of 40 (24 max)
=== RTOS ===
Static ram: 154604
Dynamic ram: 164252 of which 44 recycled
Exception stack ram used: 272
Never used ram: 74044
Tasks: NETWORK(ready,1968) HEAT(blocked,1188) CanReceiv(suspended,3512) CanSender(suspended,1488) CanClock(blocked,1452) TMC(blocked,192) MAIN(running,4488) IDLE(ready,76)
Owned mutexes:
=== Platform ===
Last reset 00:00:35 ago, cause: software
Last software reset at 2020-10-24 09:35, reason: Assertion failed, spinning module GCodes, available RAM 72892 bytes (slot 2)
Software reset code 0x4123 HFSR 0x00000000 CFSR 0x00000000 ICSR 0x0444a80f BFAR 0x00000000 SP 0x2045fe9c Task MAIN
Stack: 00000194 00484cd0 00463dbf 00000000 00000000 00000001 2044cff8 2044cfa8 2043f1a8 00000001 2043f120 
Error status: 0
MCU temperature: min 25.2, current 25.8, max 26.0
Supply voltage: min 24.1, current 24.1, max 24.1, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0, power good: yes
12V rail voltage: min 12.0, current 12.1, max 12.1, under voltage events: 0
Driver 0: standstill, reads 41315, writes 19 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Driver 1: standstill, reads 41315, writes 19 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Driver 2: standstill, reads 41318, writes 17 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Driver 3: standstill, reads 41317, writes 18 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Driver 4: standstill, reads 41319, writes 17 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Driver 5: standstill, reads 41319, writes 17 timeouts 0, SG min/max 0/0
Date/time: 2020-10-24 09:36:26
Slowest loop: 5.83ms; fastest: 0.14ms
=== Storage ===
Free file entries: 10
SD card 0 not detected, interface speed: 37.5MBytes/sec
SD card longest read time 0.0ms, write time 0.0ms, max retries 0
=== Move ===
Hiccups: 0(0), FreeDm: 375, MinFreeDm: 375, MaxWait: 0ms
Bed compensation in use: none, comp offset 0.000
=== MainDDARing ===
Scheduled moves: 0, completed moves: 0, StepErrors: 0, LaErrors: 0, Underruns: 0, 0  CDDA state: -1
=== AuxDDARing ===
Scheduled moves: 0, completed moves: 0, StepErrors: 0, LaErrors: 0, Underruns: 0, 0  CDDA state: -1
=== Heat ===
Bed heaters = 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1, chamberHeaters = 3 -1 -1 -1
Heater 1 is on, I-accum = 0.0
=== GCodes ===
Segments left: 0
Movement lock held by null
HTTP* is ready with "M122" in state(s) 0
Telnet is idle in state(s) 0
File is idle in state(s) 0
USB is idle in state(s) 0
Aux is idle in state(s) 0
Trigger* is idle in state(s) 0
Queue is idle in state(s) 0
LCD is idle in state(s) 0
SBC is idle in state(s) 0
Daemon* is doing "G4 S30" in state(s) 0 0, running macro
Aux2 is idle in state(s) 0
Autopause is idle in state(s) 0
Code queue is empty.
=== Network ===
Slowest loop: 1.29ms; fastest: 0.01ms
Responder states: HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) FTP(0) Telnet(0), 0 sessions Telnet(0), 0 sessions
HTTP sessions: 0 of 8
- Ethernet -
State: disabled
Error counts: 0 0 0 0 0
Socket states: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
=== CAN ===
Messages sent 156, longest wait 2ms for type 6018
=== Linux interface ===
State: 0, failed transfers: 1
Last transfer: 21ms ago
RX/TX seq numbers: 44842/1122
SPI underruns 0, overruns 0
Number of disconnects: 0
Buffer RX/TX: 0/0-0
=== Duet Control Server ===
Duet Control Server v3.1.1
Daemon:
Buffered code: G4 S30 ; delay running again or next command for at least 60 seconds
==> 32 bytes
Executing macro daemon.g, started by system
> Next stack level
Code buffer space: 4096
Configured SPI speed: 8000000 Hz
Full transfers per second: 22.78

Marco Bona

@dc42, this is the error I made when I read the daemon.g file in SBC mode:

Error: Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC (channel Daemon)

It is repeated every 10 seconds, although there is a 30 seconds delay in the file

dc42

Thank. Please provide the daemon.g file you were using.

Marco Bona

@dc42 ,Here it is, as you can see it is a very simple command.

daemon.g

Now I'm trying to reformat sd card and perform step-by-step installation. I'll update you as soon as possible

jay_s_uk

@Marco-Bona
daemon.g is ran every second so adding a 60 second delay really isn't a good idea.

Marco Bona

@jay_s_uk, the purpose is to view the voltage periodically, it always worked

Marco Bona

@dc42 , i reset everythingand I encounter the same problems as before. When I recall the file with M98 P"clean_nozzle.g" now this error also appears:

Error: Failed to get macro response within 8000ms from SBC (channel HTTP)
Warning: Macro file clean_nozzle.g not found

I also point out that the machine is very slow when performing homing while if I delete daemon.g during homing it works correctly

jay_s_uk

@Marco-Bona said in issues after upgrading to RRF3.2 beta3:

I also point out that the machine is very slow when performing homing while if I delete daemon.g during homing it works correctly

@Marco-Bona yes, because you're blocking a system file by delaying it for 60 seconds which, as i pointed out before, is not a good idea. it gets ran every second and then blocks for 60 seconds, which will block system resources

Marco Bona

@jay_s_uk , I would like to give you reason but even eliminating the delay does not change the behavior, explain it to me now

jay_s_uk

did you wait at least 60 seconds for the queue to flush? or even better, restart the machine?

Marco Bona

@jay_s_uk , of course, I also took off the power to be sure

jay_s_uk

Could be due to the issue that dc42 mentioned about echos.
Try using M118.
And why send a message when the voltage is ok? why not just limit to sending a message when its not ok. That way, you won't get deluged by messages.

Marco Bona

@dc42, I did some evidence, it would seem that by deleting this part

if move.axes[2].userPosition <= 40
 G90
 G1 Z40 F900 ;move z bed for clearance

of clean_nozzle.g there are no errors. Politely you can verify that the code is right even if I do not explain why in standalone mode it has no problems. The curious thing is that it would seem that eliminating conditional instructions there are no problems