Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    chamber heater alarms out expecting 1.8C/sec

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Using Duet Controllers
    2
    24
    996
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rexxundefined
      rexx @oozeBot
      last edited by

      @oozebot
      so C d or R sets the heating time out expected themistor or thermocouple feed back
      is R0.01 under the .1 so .01 does that mean it ignores the .1-1 set points as it lower than the default swing?

      big up from the newer guy if it has not been obvious... i thank you for your guidance

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rexxundefined
        rexx
        last edited by rexx

        ;M307 H0 B1 C7200 D50 R0.01 does this look possible to you my chamber is 0

        i am using 3-32VDC control side ssr to 120vac switching side and a thermocouple J tru daughter board
        J is showing heats correctly on the chamber in DWC

        oozeBotundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • oozeBotundefined
          oozeBot @rexx
          last edited by oozeBot

          @rexx check out the thread I linked below. I don't see any issue with your M307 as long as your chamber is heater 0.

          With our current M307, here is what RRF is reporting:

          Heater 2: heating rate 0.010, cooling rate 0.014, dead time 50.00, max PWM 1.00, mode bang-bang
          

          https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/26733/3-4b7-7-chamber-heater-faults

          rexxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • rexxundefined
            rexx @oozeBot
            last edited by rexx

            @oozebot 👍 👍

            lucky i can run the chamber with the doors open as the chamber was designed to run FLA full load amps continuiously if needed its only alarms that are an issue as long as the chamber fans are on i am good to draw endlessly if needed but wont be needed if you get me

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • rexxundefined
              rexx
              last edited by rexx

              ok so i tried it and it heated a tad bit longer before

              Heater 0 fault: temperature rising too slowly: expected 0.76°C/sec measured -0.01°C/sec
              elapsed time was like 4-5 sec on

              oozeBotundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • oozeBotundefined
                oozeBot @rexx
                last edited by

                @rexx What that is saying is that the measured temp actually decreased between polling. Perhaps that is due to your doors being open? I guess I was thinking momentarily opening the doors, not leaving them open.

                So your current M307 is?

                M307 H0 B1 C7200 D50 R0.01
                
                rexxundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • rexxundefined
                  rexx @oozeBot
                  last edited by

                  @oozebot
                  yes but the 5 sec is not enough time to get to the thermistor
                  my pannels are off for testing once i get heats on long enough i will close them but i can still touch the heater itself warm but not hot so the termocouple wont see it either if my hand cant tell either will the termistor 8" away

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • rexxundefined
                    rexx @oozeBot
                    last edited by

                    @oozebot
                    i feel a hair dryer on a relay to the thermocouple could keep the heater alarms happy "lol not doing jk"

                    oozeBotundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • oozeBotundefined
                      oozeBot @rexx
                      last edited by oozeBot

                      @rexx Something that may have helped us out is that the probe for the chamber heater is mounted on our toolheads. We park it dead center of the build plate, a few mm up on Z, when preheating our machines.

                      rexxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • rexxundefined
                        rexx @oozeBot
                        last edited by

                        @oozebot
                        Probe is in the chamber itself on the circulating side of the air return (OEM STRATASYS 768 chamber) so the probe will only get heat after the entire chamber starts to rise its not a small printer at all

                        oozeBotundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • oozeBotundefined
                          oozeBot @rexx
                          last edited by

                          @rexx I'm afraid you are running up against the same issue we were able to overcome where the probe simply can't dip negative without causing a heater fault. Adding @dc42 for awareness.

                          rexxundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • oozeBotundefined
                            oozeBot @rexx
                            last edited by oozeBot

                            @rexx said in chamber heater alarms out expecting 1.8C/sec:

                            Heater 0 fault: temperature rising too slowly: expected 0.76°C/sec measured -0.01°C/sec

                            I'm curious about this though. I would not have anticipated the "expected 0.76c/sec" with that M307. We were seeing errors like:

                            Error: Heater 0 fault: temperature rising too slowly: expected -0.00°C/sec measured -0.01°C/sec
                            

                            do you have M141 set?

                            https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/M141

                            rexxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • rexxundefined
                              rexx @oozeBot
                              last edited by

                              @oozebot of course it would be to easy to set and forget a simple heater why not use a time out call for heat only 2 min it should see a increase in temp 5 min should continue to see increases and 15 min the target must have been reached once to stay on
                              add a temprature deviaton of 15% for opening the door

                              its rocket science apparently but i thank you for your time today and efforts and shares in relation

                              as for the probe on your head i cannot do this as i have a peltier cooling plate on the heat break to disable heat creeps but was not on during this testing

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • rexxundefined
                                rexx @oozeBot
                                last edited by

                                @oozebot
                                M141 H0 this is all 141 under chamber config.g

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • rexxundefined
                                  rexx @oozeBot
                                  last edited by

                                  @oozebot

                                  under temps are going to happen: the static no fan ambient temp is hotter than circulating fan air so when the chamber fans go on the temps will go down until heats are seen everytime you apply chamber on from ambient temps i would expect a dip first it is naturally going to happen
                                  if the probe is too close to the heater you will not accheve the real setpoint where it is needed calling off the heats to soon

                                  oozeBotundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • oozeBotundefined
                                    oozeBot @rexx
                                    last edited by

                                    @rexx I agree - its frustrating. However, I do understand why the fault tolerances were tightened they way they were. It just doesn't translate well to chamber heaters.

                                    You know, I shouldn't even suggest this, but.. it would be possible control your heater's SSR through daemon.g and just toggle it on and off based on a set temp. That is not a good long term solution, and bypasses all protection, but.. it would work.

                                    rexxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • rexxundefined
                                      rexx @oozeBot
                                      last edited by

                                      @oozebot
                                      this is likley what i need as the chamber has thermal snaps eveywhere OEM so is partially safe from over temps the thing is it would be nice to catch a latched SSR on over time out this is all i wanted the duet to do

                                      heater timed out......5,10,15 min to easy i guess... i will try to learn about this DAEMON.G thanks again!

                                      super cheers for the help here🥃

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • rexxundefined
                                        rexx
                                        last edited by

                                        the other option that would really bite but is possible put the chamber heats on a sepeperate outboard controller and call it a day and delete all chamber crap from the configs i feel this is a key part to duet and am shocked this is still a loose end for such a key component i wish i would have know before hand and just built it this way instead perhaps......

                                        but i was pretty sure this would have not been an issue i was wrong! rolling in my hand a T-100 1/2 din TCcontroller wishing i would have not bought the j type daughter board to keep the oem thermocouple then was the clear choice

                                        there is allways more than one way to skin a cat! where to start is again the question...kick this one down the road abit longer or just replace it!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA