Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Confirmation on wiring 2nd z axis motor

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    2
    10
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • totalitarianundefined
      totalitarian
      last edited by

      I'm afraid I'm going to need step by step instructions on how to do this. I have a cr-10 and the two stepper motors for the z sometimes go out of sync. So I want to drive each independently and use my probe to level them. I have read the instruction but i'm still a little confused. I'm homing Z using a single piezo probe.

      M584 X0 Y1 Z2:4 U4 E4 is as far as I have got so far

      The right stepper is plugged into Dive 4 and the left leadscrew is drive 2

      From home.
      Left leadscrew is x-20 y100
      Right leadscrew is x325 y100

      What should M671 be? M671 X-20.0:325.0 Y100.0:100.0;

      Do I need to edit my homing files?

      What gcode is need to level and then mesh level?

      When I try to home all I get errors about U not being homed

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        Remove the U4 from the M584 command. Assuming your extruder drive motor is connected to the E0 output it should be E3 not E4 in that command. Set up a bed.g file as described at https://www.duet3d.com/wiki/Bed_levelling_using_multiple_independent_Z_motors.

        You do not need to change your homing files.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • totalitarianundefined
          totalitarian
          last edited by

          Like this?

          [[language]]
          M584 X0 Y1 Z2:4 E3 ;enable dual z steppers (right is drive 4, left is drive 2)
          M671 X-20.0:325.0 Y100.0:100.0 ; leadscrew offsets from home
          
          
          [[language]]
          G28                         ; home
          G30 P0 X20 Y100 Z-99999     ; probe near a leadscrew
          G30 P1 X280 Y100 Z-99999 S2   ; probe near a leadscrew
          G29
          
          

          It doesn't seem to adjust the leadscrews even though the popup tells me it has

          [c]Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.067 -0.125, points used 2, deviation before 0.078 after 0.000[/c]

          Here is my heightmap

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            If you run leadscrew adjustment again, are the reported adjustments larger or smaller?

            What Z probe are you using?

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • totalitarianundefined
              totalitarian
              last edited by

              This is it again

              Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.058 -0.115, points used 2, deviation before 0.071 after 0.000
              ```and one more for good luck
              

              [[language]]
              Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.075 -0.100, points used 2, deviation before 0.067 after 0.000

              It's piezo probe [www.precisionpiezo.co.uk](http://www.precisionpiezo.co.uk) never had any issues with it.
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • totalitarianundefined
                totalitarian
                last edited by

                Very strange, I've now managed to get it level but it's not worked as slick as I hoped.

                Here is the console log of what I had to do. Not quite sure why I had to run G32 so many times… I must be doing something wrong...

                [[language]]
                07:25:45G29
                25 points probed, mean error 0.052, deviation 0.051
                Height map saved to file heightmap.csv
                07:24:22Leadscrew adjustments made: -0.045 -0.048, points used 2, deviation before 0.046 after 0.000
                07:23:57G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: -0.045 -0.042, points used 2, deviation before 0.044 after 0.000
                07:23:31G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.001 -0.052, points used 2, deviation before 0.032 after 0.000
                07:22:40M561
                07:22:10G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: -0.009 -0.082, points used 2, deviation before 0.053 after 0.000
                07:21:34G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.050 -0.123, points used 2, deviation before 0.074 after 0.000
                07:20:53G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.153 -0.218, points used 2, deviation before 0.143 after 0.000
                07:19:43G29
                25 points probed, mean error 0.320, deviation 0.105
                Height map saved to file heightmap.csv
                07:18:01G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: -0.034 -0.044, points used 2, deviation before 0.039 after 0.000
                07:16:3825 points probed, mean error 0.288, deviation 0.109
                Height map saved to file heightmap.csv
                07:15:29G32
                Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.560 -0.627, points used 2, deviation before 0.448 after 0.000
                07:14:46Connection established!
                
                
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • totalitarianundefined
                  totalitarian
                  last edited by

                  Happy to help debug this more if there is a logical series of steps I can take

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators
                    last edited by

                    The algorithm used by RRF to level the bed using independent leadscrew movements assumes that the bed is free to pivot about the leadscrew nuts. Evidently that is not happening in your case, because your mechanics is resisting attempts to level the bed by adjusting the leadscrews. This could mean that your gantry X axis is not quite at right angles to the leadscrews.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • totalitarianundefined
                      totalitarian
                      last edited by

                      I can certainly level the gantry by hand using the leadscrews (the bed is fixed). It needs to lock one motor whilst the other rotates. Does it do that?

                      Also, not sure why the G32 reports the bed as level on subsequent runs but G29 does not.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators
                        last edited by

                        The firmware adjusts both leadscrews simultaneously.

                        It does seem odd that G29 and G32 see the bed differently. Where are the two bed.g probe points in relation to the points on the height map grid? If they are outside the grid then I suggest you move them in a little to coincide with the edges of the grid.

                        If you can't see the leadscrews moving at all, maybe you have the Z speed and/or acceleration set too high?

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA