Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Progress on Path Smoothing / Lookahead?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Firmware wishlist
    7
    25
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MJLewundefined
      MJLew @CCS86
      last edited by

      @CCS86 Well, all I can say is that the latest PrusaSlicer has arc fitting and it seems to slice as fast with it active as it does without on my Mac M1.

      CCS86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • CCS86undefined
        CCS86 @MJLew
        last edited by

        @MJLew said in Progress on Path Smoothing / Lookahead?:

        @CCS86 Well, all I can say is that the latest PrusaSlicer has arc fitting and it seems to slice as fast with it active as it does without on my Mac M1.

        Have you looked at the code?

        It's easy to go fast when you don't actually fit arcs.

        d0d9e2eb-d416-40df-940b-c5bb182417f1-image.png

        Plus, even when successfully fitting arcs, they inject some variability into the wall surface. You can see something similar if you make the slicing resolution more coarse.

        MJLewundefined droftartsundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • MJLewundefined
          MJLew
          last edited by

          Yes, I did look at the code.Screen Shot 2023-12-01 at 3.21.33 pm.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MJLewundefined
            MJLew @CCS86
            last edited by

            @CCS86 We do not need to argue about this. Fitting arcs will take longer than not fitting arcs, but there are some (many, probably) use-cases and examples where the time difference is trivial. Your experience is vast and your opinion is valid, but it is quite likely that I also have relevant experience.

            CCS86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • CCS86undefined
              CCS86 @MJLew
              last edited by

              @MJLew said in Progress on Path Smoothing / Lookahead?:

              @CCS86 We do not need to argue about this. Fitting arcs will take longer than not fitting arcs, but there are some (many, probably) use-cases and examples where the time difference is trivial. Your experience is vast and your opinion is valid, but it is quite likely that I also have relevant experience.

              It's called a discussion, not an argument. That's the whole purpose of this forum.

              If you have relevant experience that leads you to a different conclusion, let's hear it. Just saying that you "likely... Have relevant experience" isn't very compelling.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • droftartsundefined
                droftarts administrators @CCS86
                last edited by

                @CCS86 That's weird, because it is definitely producing arcs for me:

                32681a12-4e7d-40bf-bac3-b20fc91371f3-image.png

                Ian

                TronXY X5S with Duet 3 MB6HC and Roto toolboard : Cartesian bed-slinger with Duet 3 Mini 5+ WiFi and 1LC : RRP Fisher Delta v1 with Duet 2 Maestro : Polargraph with Duet 2 WiFi

                CCS86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • CCS86undefined
                  CCS86 @droftarts
                  last edited by CCS86

                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • CCS86undefined
                    CCS86
                    last edited by CCS86

                    I put my g-code resolution back to the default value and it started generating arcs. It only does it on external perimeters though. So artifacts from linear segmented inner walls can still print through.

                    But again, for the sake of our discussion, until RRF allows true arc support, the quality with G2/G3 is worse than without.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • CCS86undefined
                      CCS86
                      last edited by

                      @dc42 is this just not going to be explored?

                      Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Phaedruxundefined
                        Phaedrux Moderator @CCS86
                        last edited by

                        @CCS86 I think the main focus right now is getting 3.5 out the door.

                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA