Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Need help to calculate rail size for new printer

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    5
    13
    1.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • c310undefined
      c310
      last edited by

      Hello! im looking to build a new delta printer (DuetWiFi of course) 🙂
      and pre-selected headbed (below)
      i think to use 2040 rail for more stability…

      Questions:

      1. do you think 2040 rail will be significantly stable compared to 2020 rail ?
      2. how to calculate needed length of rail for top / bottom ?

      thank you in advance!

      from here https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3D-printing-table-PCB-MK3-heat-bed-Delta-rostock-round-with-ears-hot-bed-aluminium-bed/32811271827.html?spm=a2g0s.8937460.0.0.MqYyxw

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        There is no easy formula, because the length of the rails depends on the geometry of the frame vertices you use. I found out that the Robotdigg aluminium vertices for 2020 and 2040 extrusions need different rail lengths when I converted my printer from 2020 to 2040 extrusions.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • c310undefined
          c310
          last edited by

          Daid,

          I converted my printer from 2020 to 2040 extrusions.

          do you find your printer much more stable on 2040? or it does not worth such an upgrade ???

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            My printer is 1m tall with a print diameter of 300mm. I didn't notice any stability issues with the previous 2020 extrusions, but I never printed a tall object on it. When building a printer of that size from scratch, the additional cost of using 2040 instead of 2020 is relatively small, so worthwhile IMO. But whether it was worthwhile for me to buy new extrusions and vertices and sell the old ones at a bargain price is much less clear. It's much the same with 0.9deg vs 1.8deg motors - it's worth buying 0.9deg motors in the first place because the additional cost is small, but probably not worth upgrading an existing printer from 1.8deg to 0.9deg.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • c310undefined
              c310
              last edited by

              David, what is your opinion on wide (300mm), but not tall printer (600-700mm)?
              2020 or 2040 ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators
                last edited by

                @c310:

                David, what is your opinion on wide (300mm), but not tall printer (600-700mm)?
                2020 or 2040 ?

                My guess is that 2020 would be adequate. But how much extra does 2040 cost compared to 2020? There might be an observable difference if you print tall objects at high print speeds and accelerations.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • c310undefined
                  c310
                  last edited by

                  2040 ads less than 25% to 2020 profile
                  and almost 100% on alloy corners.

                  I'm building high precision machine that i want to run high speed… and it should look proportional :))

                  another thing that i want to do - is to hide power supply and DuetWiFi board under the plate.
                  with either type of profile i will need to get "3rd row" of corners.
                  1st will be sitting on the desk,
                  2nd - will hold the plate
                  3rd one - on the top.

                  electronics will be between 1st and 2nd. for thermal isolation i found great material - aerogel https://youtu.be/5sw1tNeJ0Rw fantastic material! that will be on the build plate back

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators
                    last edited by

                    Check out my build at https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com/dc42s-large-kossel-build/, you can hide the PSU and Duet under the bed using standard 60mm high 2020 or 2040 vertices.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Danalundefined
                      Danal
                      last edited by

                      If you intend to use Robotdigg 2040 style corners, try this calculator:

                      http://danalspub.com/DKcalc/

                      Tip: Drag the effector to move it. Drag NOT on the effector to orbit/pan the whole printer. Try all your mouse buttons and rollers.

                      Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Dougal1957undefined
                        Dougal1957
                        last edited by

                        Nice work but what with the banana lol

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • c310undefined
                          c310
                          last edited by

                          I guess it is used to match printer with real size… assuming you have seen banana at least once :))

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DjDemonDundefined
                            DjDemonD
                            last edited by

                            I'd got for 2040 for an Xl sized machine I did and the frame is very stiff. 2020 with cross bracing works but I its not a clean or neat look IMO.

                            Also if buying linear rail for axes a 1m tall printer only needs 600mm rail unless your rods are too short I bought longer and had to cut them down,and they cost more.

                            My build is here http://forums.reprap.org/read.php?178,702599 was based on David's but included everything up to date as of about a year ago. Now sporting smarteffector, nimble and enclosure/watercooling.

                            Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                            www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                            PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Danalundefined
                              Danal
                              last edited by

                              @Dougal1957:

                              Nice work but what with the banana lol

                              Obscure reference to reddit.

                              And, when you zoom in, it really does have a scale…

                              Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA