Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Another Delta question X,Y,Z

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    3
    5
    781
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BPisLifeundefined
      BPisLife
      last edited by

      I think this one is simple. I printed a 20mm cube test and Z is good, but X is off my .25mm and the Y by .2mm. I never calibrated the steps/mm and this is my question. On my traditional Cartesian printers, X associated with the X motor, Y with the Y motor and Z with the Z motor. N

      ow I know the Delta rails are each X,Y,Z based on connection, but does adjusting the M92 command for X, Y, Z adjust the actual X, Y, Z of the printed part or does it mess with the delta system? I know I am over thinking it, but wanted some moral support before I dive in and make changes I regret.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Danalundefined
        Danal
        last edited by

        Do not adjust M92. Your Z being correct proves M92 is set correctly.

        X Y dimensional accuracy is controlled by adjusting your "Delta Rod Length", using the M665 L parameter.

        M665 L can also be auto-set by G30; if you have a good probe, like a Smart Effector, this works very well.

        Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BPisLifeundefined
          BPisLife
          last edited by

          Glad I asked. I am using the smart effector, but the X,Y is still off. Hmm, I will play around a bit with the smart effectors probing.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            It's usually best to leave the delta rod length alone in the M665 command and correct small dimensional errors using M579 instead.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BPisLifeundefined
              BPisLife
              last edited by

              OK, I will look into using the M579 but that may get tricky with the scaling. That said, X and Y are off nearly by the same amount so maybe it won't be too bad. Will make small adjustments until I get it in that sweet spot.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA