Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    0.9 degree nema 23 steppers configuration.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    4
    11
    867
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Stevoundefined
      Stevo
      last edited by Stevo

      I am using 2 Bipolar 4wire Nema 23's for a dual z axis on a core xy build I'm using the configurator to enter the settings for a Duet 2 WiFi. I am a little confusedbolded text as to entry for the Microstepping I am using 1204 ball screw's so 4mm pitch so that's 400 steps per 1 full revolution so 100 steps to do 1mm of travel on the screw then at 16x that's 1600.
      They don't sound very smooth at all what have I messed up on.0_1558302183581_Screenshot 2019-05-19 at 22.42.14.png

      Manufacturer Part Number: 23HM22-2804S
      Motor Type: Bipolar Stepper
      Step Angle: 0.9 deg
      Holding Torque: 1.26Nm(178.4oz.in)
      Rated Current/phase: 2.8A
      Voltage: 2.5V
      Phase Resistance: 0.9ohms
      Inductance: 4.5mH ± 20%(1KHz)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Former User?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        (Guess you mean 0.9 degree, adds some confusion to your title)

        If you add your configs and include which Duet board you have people might be able to offer some suggestions.

        Stevoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Stevoundefined
          Stevo @A Former User
          last edited by

          @bearer
          Thank you for that I did mean 0.9 degree what other configuration information do you require other than what’s on the stepper setup screen capture to be able to give further advise.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Vetiundefined
            Veti
            last edited by

            https://blog.prusaprinters.org/calculator/

            x16 interpolation
            4mm pitch
            0.9 degree motor
            = 1600 steps per milimeter

            Stevoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Stevoundefined
              Stevo @Veti
              last edited by

              @veti thank you, much appreciated clarification.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Former User?
                A Former User
                last edited by

                1600 steps/mm is somewhat high resolution so was unclear what you mean by it not sounding very smooth, and it wasn't very clear that your question was if the steps/mm was correct, but if that was it then yeah, as Veti confirms its indeed correct. From the initial wording it sounded more like you had issues with is not sounding smooth when being driven, which will depend on configuration, and different boards have different drivers, voltages make a difference and so on.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Vetiundefined
                  Veti
                  last edited by

                  the noise will be highly dependent on the max z speed.
                  try something in the range of 20-60mm/min

                  Stevoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Stevoundefined
                    Stevo
                    last edited by

                    Thanks for the invaluable info guys appreciated.
                    Just been trying different inputs on a different stepper calculator.
                    I’m thinking that 400 steps at x1 will give me a native motor resolution of 0.01 will try this out later on.

                    deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Vetiundefined
                      Veti
                      last edited by

                      that will be a lot noisier.
                      the duet wifi steppers only support interpolation at x16

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • deckingmanundefined
                        deckingman @Stevo
                        last edited by

                        @stevo said in 0.9 degree nema 23 steppers configuration.:

                        Thanks for the invaluable info guys appreciated.
                        Just been trying different inputs on a different stepper calculator.
                        I’m thinking that 400 steps at x1 will give me a native motor resolution of 0.01 will try this out later on.

                        You should be referring to the lead of the screws, not the pitch. This is important because if they are 2 or 4 start, then the lead will be double or 4 times what the pitch is. It just so happens that with single start screws, the lead and the pitch happen to be the same. Assuming they are single start and that 1 revolution would move a nut linearly 4mm, then you can say that 400 full steps equates to 4mm. So 100 full steps would equate to 1mm. For there it s easy to work out the steps per mm for any chosen micro-stepping by multiplying the full steps mm (in this case 100) x the micro stepping. So your first calculation of 1600 steps per mm at 16X micro-stepping was correct. But if the lead is different because the screws are not single start, then so will the steps per mm be.

                        Ian
                        https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                        https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Stevoundefined
                          Stevo @Veti
                          last edited by

                          @veti Many thanks you hit the ball straight out of the park have slowed the speed down a little and all is well.

                          Thank you

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA