Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Is anyone still using 5-point bed compensation?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    2
    10
    376
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators
      last edited by dc42

      ...because I'm thinking of removing it from the RRF 3.01 release. The recommended replacement is 3x3 mesh bed compensation, although that doesn't allow you to set trigger height corrections (G30 H parameters) on each point.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      Luke'sLaboratoryundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Luke'sLaboratoryundefined
        Luke'sLaboratory @dc42
        last edited by

        @dc42 is this something like G30 S5 where its supposed to execute (at least on non-deltas) adjustments to the bed plane (live levelling)? I was planning on giving it a try (because it covers more of my large bed vs just 3 point i'm currently using) but if there's an option to use a 3x3 grid (9pts) instead of 5pts to tram my bed, no worries.

        Luke
        http://lukeslab.online

        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dc42undefined
          dc42 administrators @Luke'sLaboratory
          last edited by

          @Luke-sLaboratory said in Is anyone still using 5-point bed compensation?:

          @dc42 is this something like G30 S5 where its supposed to execute (at least on non-deltas) adjustments to the bed plane (live levelling)? I was planning on giving it a try (because it covers more of my large bed vs just 3 point i'm currently using) but if there's an option to use a 3x3 grid (9pts) instead of 5pts to tram my bed, no worries.

          Yes.

          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

          Luke'sLaboratoryundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Luke'sLaboratoryundefined
            Luke'sLaboratory @dc42
            last edited by

            @dc42 Neat! I have no issues with dropping 5 point if it means we can use a mesh to retilt the bed.

            Is the mesh option for live-level a current feature, or something that will be added in 3.01 under G29 (or similar)?

            Luke
            http://lukeslab.online

            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators @Luke'sLaboratory
              last edited by

              @Luke-sLaboratory said in Is anyone still using 5-point bed compensation?:

              @dc42 Neat! I have no issues with dropping 5 point if it means we can use a mesh to retilt the bed.

              Is the mesh option for live-level a current feature, or something that will be added in 3.01 under G29 (or similar)?

              I think you are asking whether it will in future possible to load a height map, then probe a small number of points and have RRF superimpose a tilt on the height map according to the result. If so, then yes I am considering adding such a feature, which would make use of the existing code for bed compensation based on 3- and 4-point probing. But 5-point probing doesn't fit into that scheme.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              Luke'sLaboratoryundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Luke'sLaboratoryundefined
                Luke'sLaboratory @dc42
                last edited by

                @dc42 said in Is anyone still using 5-point bed compensation?:

                I think you are asking whether it will in future possible to load a height map, then probe a small number of points and have RRF superimpose a tilt on the height map according to the result. If so, then yes I am considering adding such a feature, which would make use of the existing code for bed compensation based on 3- and 4-point probing. But 5-point probing doesn't fit into that scheme.

                I'm not looking for a superimposed tilt on the mesh, I'm looking for using a mesh to inform the live-level feature (could be a coarse 3x3 or 5x5 mesh) before a detailed "surface map" mesh is used. Just to be clear, instead of using individual points like in the tutorials here: https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Bed_levelling_using_multiple_independent_Z_motors I'd like to be able to specify the mesh to use for calibration like

                M557 X15:600 Y15:600 P5:5 ; Set mesh for bed auto-tilt
                G29 S0 A1 B3 ; Probe New Mesh, use for autocalibration, 3 motors,
                

                This (in theory) would use the same technique as current bed levelling w/ multiple independent z-motors to calulate the movement needed, but would greatly simplify user inputs.

                for a cherry on top, could build in similar z-probe features like results must be within XXX variation and YYY maximum amount of tries to get that, similar to what conditional scripts are doing today.

                Luke
                http://lukeslab.online

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators
                  last edited by

                  We were talking about different things. It will still be possible to use 5 points when doing bed tilt correction using independent Z motors.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Luke'sLaboratoryundefined
                    Luke'sLaboratory
                    last edited by

                    @dc42 Thanks for the explanation, sounds good.

                    Would be pretty neat to be able to use a mesh for live levelling though! 😁

                    Luke
                    http://lukeslab.online

                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators @Luke'sLaboratory
                      last edited by

                      @Luke-sLaboratory said in Is anyone still using 5-point bed compensation?:

                      @dc42 Thanks for the explanation, sounds good.

                      Would be pretty neat to be able to use a mesh for live levelling though! 😁

                      Why?

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Luke'sLaboratoryundefined
                        Luke'sLaboratory
                        last edited by

                        Greatly would simplify setting up the bed.g macro and aid in understanding (at least for me!) - once you know how the mesh works, you know how both live-levelling and mesh compensation work.

                        Purely convenience. I haven't touched my bed.g in a few months.

                        Luke
                        http://lukeslab.online

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA