Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    One heater using 2 outputs?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    2
    6
    107
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BoAundefined
      BoA
      last edited by BoA

      I have a chamber heater that has 2 sections - 24V 5A each. I am using Duet3 and I would like to configure it so the out2 and out3 drive each section, but I always end up with only one output working.

      Is there any way to define single chamber heater, that uses 2 outputs in parallel in RRF 3.1.1?
      Or map 2 heaters as a chamber heaters...

      And yes, I know that I can use external mosfet, but I am trying no to.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by dc42

        You can define multiple chamber heaters, e.g. M141 P0 H2 for the first and M141 P1 H3 for the second. However, if they both heat the same area then the PIDs may fight with each other if you don't get the settings just right.

        Are you using the bed heater output already?

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        BoAundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BoAundefined
          BoA
          last edited by BoA

          Two chamber heaters might, and probably will, cause PID related issues.

          I am using bed heater output, just as intended - for bed heater, but I have to measure the current it takes. Perhaps it is possible to move it to out2/3.
          EDIT: it takes about 10A, so no go for out2/3 for bed heater.

          I tried something like M950 H2 C"out2+out3", but only one output works. Also M141 H2:3 is not a way to go.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BoAundefined
            BoA @dc42
            last edited by

            @dc42 What if I use on/off instead of PID? Should this skip the PID issues ?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators
              last edited by

              I would use PID. If you use exactly the same PID constants for both and don't have the I term set too high then they should stay in step. But you can use bang-bang if you prefer.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              BoAundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BoAundefined
                BoA @dc42
                last edited by

                @dc42 I will try solution with 2 heaters defined.

                But in general there is no way to define one heater using more than one outputs, and mosfet appears to be the only solution to make it less workaround-ish.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA