RRF3 seems to ignore PrusaSlicer Acceleration Control
-
@dc42 - thank you for the note, the F parameter is indeed in the M563 notes but is buried in the text, probably why I missed that. Can the gcode note be updated in the Wiki to make this more noticeable? That note / coding isn't formatted like other examples in the text. Something like this?
M563 P0 D0 H1 F0:1 ; tool 0 uses extruder drive 0 and heater 1. Fan 0 and Fan 1 are mapped to tool 0
-
There is already this example:
M563 P2 D0:1 H1:2 X0:3 F0:2 ; create a tool using extruder drives 0 and 1, heaters 1 and 2, with X movement mapped to both X and U axes and fan 0 mapped to fans 0 and 2
-
Just as a heads-up for you all, Merill acknowledged the issue and will have it fixed in Superslicer in the upcoming release.
See: https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSlicer/issues/450#issuecomment-687650047
-
Just ran into this while debugging a print time discrepancy. There is an issue open with Prusa Slicer so hopefully it gets fixed soon: https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/issues/5599