Issues after prime

Heartleander81

I had the whole duet2 and duet3 firmware in the firmware folder.

Ok, that's been taking a lot longer. If necessary, I have to do it again via Bossa

Heartleander81

@dc42
I first flashed back 3.3 again.
Will make a backup of the SD card tomorrow.
Then I test the update to 3.4 Beta again.

Heartleander81

This post is deleted!

dc42

@heartleander81 if you are running with SBC then you will need to upgrade to the official 3.4beta2 release from the unstable feed of the package server first, so that you have a compatible version of DCS on your SBC.

Heartleander81

I forget who I must at Pi config the change stabil to unstabel.

Have anyone a link for me?

[Edit] I have found it.

Heartleander81

@dc42

Hello good news. The error is gone with the update to 3.4Beta2 that I got from you yesterday evening. Switching from M400 to T0 did not change anything. I will make test prints today if everything is going as usual.

dc42

@heartleander81, thanks for your feedback.

Heartleander81

This post is deleted!

Heartleander81

@dc42
I could still see something. The message for the G32 bed compensation now comes directly after the bed has been measured. In the past, the message came between the start code and the print. Using the example of the last code, not directly after the G32 but before the M400 / T0

Heartleander81

The first Print is done. 20x20 Cube with 1mm high.

Heartleander81

@dc42

If you are interested that you need a beta tester, I would contact you, as my board apparently behaves differently. But I tested 2 duet3 6hc boards that had generated the same errors.

dc42

@heartleander81 said in Issues after prime:

@dc42

If you are interested that you need a beta tester, I would contact you, as my board apparently behaves differently. But I tested 2 duet3 6hc boards that had generated the same errors.

Thanks for the offer. I did eventually notice that there was a difference that depending on the presence of the M400 or T0 command. So I don't think your boards behaved differently, it was just that on my bench setup the problem was hard to see because the motors were not moving a carriage.

Heartleander81

@dc42

OK. As said. My offer stands. Just write an email to me and if I have time I can do a real-time test. Thank you for your help and that it worked so quickly.

Heartleander81

@dc42 One more question. Will the change be included in the next beta?

dc42

@heartleander81 said in Issues after prime:

@dc42 One more question. Will the change be included in the next beta?

Yes, it's already in the 3.4-dev branch source code.

Heartleander81

@dc42 thank you for All.