Duet3D Logo

    Duet3D

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order

    Home Assistant Integration

    Third-party software
    14
    44
    1269
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Lyr3x
      Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by Lyr3x

      Edit: Alright, I just released a new version of the integration. ConfigFlow is now working as well as the service. The binary sensor is still dead. You need to remove the configuration from your configuration.yaml and just setup the integration via UI. I unfortunately need to ask you to reconfigure the Integration later again, because I want to attach the entities to a device. But its in a working mode now! Please do not hesitate with feedback.

      @nikscha Yep realized that as well, sorry. I decided to stop trying to patch the stuff I want to remove anyway and fix the config flow setup and remove the configuration.yaml code completely. I already have a working unpolished state. Bear with me a little more. Ill update you all here later!

      nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • nikscha
        nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

        @Lyr3x No worries! It's working now, config flow as well. I suggest naming the fields in the config flow. I tried doing this myself and creating a pull request but honestly I am just not that good at Python ^^
        I also tried making a textfield card to send typed Gcodes, but I also gave up and instead asked for help here

        I also tested some gcodes, most of them seem to work just fine but I noticed a strange delay when sending a M291 P"X" R"X" S3. This doesn't happen with S2, S1 or S0. Maybe this is intentional behaviour? Sending the same command from within DWC returns instantly though.

        Lyr3x 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Lyr3x
          Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by

          @nikscha what do you mean with naming the fields? They all have labels

          I’ll test the gcode tomorrow and see if I can find out what causes the delay!

          nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • nikscha
            nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

            @Lyr3x The fields are prefilled, but it doesn't say what should be in there. This is what it looks like with the prefilled values removed: 4b9af3c0-5a02-49dc-b3d5-bad0a1dc0d38-image.png
            What does the checkbox do for example?
            Looking at the code I can figure out its the field "has_bed", and I think that should be mentioned in the config flow as well

            Lyr3x 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Lyr3x
              Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by Lyr3x

              @nikscha Interesting. That is not what I see here
              20f59511-1629-40a4-9ebc-e0bf90ab2cde-image.png
              Did you remove the integration completely once?
              Yeah, the checkbox is the check if you have a hotbed or not

              nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • nikscha
                nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

                @Lyr3x Hmmmm πŸ€”
                Not that I know of. Do you want me to test it?

                Lyr3x 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Lyr3x
                  Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by Lyr3x

                  @nikscha Yep do that, maybe there is something cached from previous iterations. I tried that for you on a fresh local installation. Labels are working as intended πŸ‘
                  There is also no delay here with M291 P"X" R"X" S3 or any other GCode. It's exactly the same as with DWC πŸ™‚

                  nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nikscha
                    nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

                    @Lyr3x That did the trick, the fields are now named.
                    The delay is still there tho.
                    Are you using a SBC?

                    Nvm I think I just communicated badly.
                    By "delay" I don't mean the time until the window pops up on DWC, but they time it takes HASS to aknowledge the service call. When calling

                    service: duet3d_printer.send_code
                    data:
                     gcode: M291 P"X" R"X" S3
                    

                    from the service tab in dev tools, it takes about 5-10 seconds for the 'call service' button to turn green. This isn't the case with other gcodes.

                    Lyr3x 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Lyr3x
                      Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by

                      @nikscha said in Home Assistant Integration:

                      service: duet3d_printer.send_codedata: gcode: M291 P"X" R"X" S3

                      Ah gotcha. That is specific to the API call. It seems to be synchronous or it times out. If you press the OK button, the request is done. The integration does not validate the GCodes but just send them to the DSF API. If you make a similar call via curl you see the exact same behavior.

                      nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • nikscha
                        nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

                        @Lyr3x Yeah that makes sense

                        Lyr3x 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Lyr3x
                          Lyr3x @nikscha last edited by Lyr3x

                          Edit 4: With v0.1.1 standalone mode is fully supported and so are multiple tools. I also implemented proper setup to prevent duplicated integrations for the same board, so multiple integrations are support now as well.

                          Edit 3: We are on v0.0.5 now. Added experimental standalone mode. Can’t test it because I am only using SBC.

                          Edit 2: Released v0.0.2. All sensors are created properly and getting async status updates every 5 seconds. Ill follow up later to make the interval configurable and I also need to take another look at finishing up the setup when the printer becomes available later

                          Edit 1: Introduced a bug in the version so that the state is not always updated properly. Working on it πŸ™‚

                          Hey folks!
                          I refactored quite a lot and we now have a proper integration between the DSF and Home Assistant. When you create the integration via ConfigFlow you have some options you can choose from, including the option to add an LED controller, which is handy if you have LED's connected to your Duet.
                          The Device itself represents the physical Duet board and shows your correct model as well as the firmware version. All entities now have unique id's and should not conflict anymore. All sensors, binary sensors and the send_gcode service should work properly now πŸ™‚

                          Keep in mind that if you have the integration already installed, you need to remove the integration once more and install it again. That is necessary, because I have rewritten the way of how entities are registered in Home Assistant.

                          You'll find all infos here in the first release: https://github.com/Lyr3x/hass-Duet3D/releases/tag/v0.0.2
                          @dc42 it would be nice if we can upload the Duet3D logo here: https://github.com/home-assistant/brands/pulls - we can use the logo then with this integration.

                          I'll look for a better solution for the Position sensor soon.
                          If you find any issues are need additional sensors, please create a GitHub issue from now on:
                          https://github.com/Lyr3x/hass-Duet3D/issues

                          I am also more then happy to accept PRs

                          3a0ea8c3-07a4-4e96-bd4a-4e2ad40a1178-image.png

                          nikscha 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • nikscha
                            nikscha @Lyr3x last edited by

                            @Lyr3x Working well so far, many thanks for your efforts!! 😊 😊

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Lyr3x
                              Lyr3x last edited by

                              Thanks, @T3P3Tony, for the support with the Logos. The integration now appears with a proper icon and the logo!

                              Unfortunately, I was forced to update the DOMAIN object one last time, which results in the situation where everyone needs to re-install the integration completely. Sorry for that! Will try to avoid future breaking changes πŸ™

                              c4669ceb-2181-4557-8e55-eae11c05e026-image.png

                              2916cd39-2ab1-4742-89c6-307609a7c92a-image.png

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA