Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Delta mesh leveling with warped result

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Tuning and tweaking
    3
    8
    692
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gtreviundefined
      gtrevi
      last edited by

      I managed to fully configure my Kossel Plus, up to having Auto Delta calibration (with a fixed BLTouch) work perfectly.
      I even succesfully printed some objects without issues.

      I wanted to try mesh leveling, but I always get the following result after all the probes:

      0_1548548723399_Annotation 2019-01-27 011542.jpg

      What could be the issue?
      Including my config.g & bed.g:

      1_1548548684464_config.g 0_1548548684463_bed.g

      Thanks for any help!

      fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fcwiltundefined
        fcwilt @gtrevi
        last edited by

        @gtrevi

        In your bed.g file there is this line:

        G30 P10 X0 Y0 H0 Z-99999 S3

        Why are you using S3 for a delta? I think S6 would be more appropriate.

        Also I don't see a M500 to save the results and the M501 in your config.g file is commented out.

        Can you elaborate on what you are doing there?

        Frederick

        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

        gtreviundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • gtreviundefined
          gtrevi @fcwilt
          last edited by

          @fcwilt thanks for pointing out raising the S parameter, definitively better option (was just using the auto-generated bed.g from the RepRap configurator).
          But unfortunately raising to S6 (also tried S9) did not have any effect on the above result.

          Regarding the M501 commented out in the config.g, it's simply because I prefer to have all values reported in the main config, rather than having an override file... but i new to Duet & RepRap, so might be doing something wrong: is it obbligatory to M500 & M501?

          Gianni

          fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fcwiltundefined
            fcwilt @gtrevi
            last edited by

            @gtrevi said in Delta mesh leveling with warped result:

            Regarding the M501 commented out in the config.g, it's simply because I prefer to have all values reported in the main config, rather than having an override file... but i new to Duet & RepRap, so might be doing something wrong: is it obbligatory to M500 & M501?

            Gianni

            No you don't have to use the override file - it's just simpler to let the firmware maintain the two files.

            Initially I felt as you do but then after sometimes failing to update the config file when the override file was updated I started using the two files as designed.

            Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

            gtreviundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators
              last edited by

              Assuming that you have set your rods length correctly in M665 and your tower steps/mm correctly in M92, your delta radius setting in M665 is a very long way out. Run auto calibration with either S4 or S6 and save the resulting M665 and M666 values. If you still have problems after that, post your config.g and bed.g. files.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              gtreviundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • gtreviundefined
                gtrevi @dc42
                last edited by

                @dc42 super, you nailed it again: I was "a bit off" with the delta radius.
                Thank you very much! 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gtreviundefined
                  gtrevi @fcwilt
                  last edited by

                  @fcwilt good point, thank you!

                  You're right, especially at the beginning, when you're always hands-on with configs, it doesn't help scattering around with all the updating here and there, in place of a simple M500.
                  On the other side though, you learn a lot about what you're doing, which isn't bad 😉

                  Now that my delta is all fine tuned, I will start relying on this suggested practice of yours for any other further tweak I may need in the future.

                  Thanks
                  Gianni

                  fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fcwiltundefined
                    fcwilt @gtrevi
                    last edited by

                    @gtrevi

                    Glad to hear you got it all sorted out.

                    Frederick

                    Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA