Cool. Thank you. Now I understand.

Thank you! You wrote: „The movement of the axes will be coordinated together.“ Does it mean the axes are moving simultanusely and will reach the point at more or less the same time? Like the distance of the axes are coordenated together (i.e for example the speed is calculated depending on the different distances) ? Or each one reaches the point depending on the distance they have to travel?
And is there a difference how the movement of the extruders is executed und relation to the movement of the axes? I thought it would be depending on how rep rap interprets the gcode.
Thank you, if you can help me with my question. If not i will try as you said with a better tweet in an other seccion…
Matthias

I wanted to write: My question is about any difference…

My quesitos is about and difference in the performance. The comands in the g code will get executed in the order they are written in the g code? It is in a cartesian printer there will First be moved the x and y axes to the position an than the z and the position of the extruders or the following new axes? Or is there and difference between extruders and aditional axes in the Order of execution?

No, they will not extrude, but regulate the output of paint through noozles.

Hello,
I have a General quesitos about extruders and axes in the reprap configuration.
I want to habe a toolhead with varius steppermotors, that on each position of the x, y axes each should be in ist own position. The motors in the toolhead only move in a scale of more or less two rounds, but they move back and forwards. Is it better for the performance to controle the steppers in the reprap firmware as aditional axes , like U,V,W… or is it better to control them as extruders? Or is both the same?
Best Matthias

Thank you!

They are driven by an external cl driver cl42

Ok. Thank you for the answer!