Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Grid calibration hardware induced errors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    2
    3
    765
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Zesty_Lykleundefined
      Zesty_Lykle
      last edited by

      After still having strange grid calibration results, I switched arms around. On the theory that if the geometry of the arms is not correct I should see it in the calibrated shape. No change, what so ever. No change if I switch one arm, or all the arms. So I am guessing that the length of my arms is pretty identical.
      So I put everything back the way it was and then rotated the effector. No change, same pattern.
      It dips deeply between the left and back column and towards the right column. In the middle it is highest.
      So that would point to the right column, yes? But in what way? I'll have to think about it.

      I rotated the Effector as well, no difference in the deformation.
      So now I have done the calibration and will print a big ring, to see if the calibration is right and my bed is THAT warped.
      I don't think it is, as I have had good first layers.

      Lykle
      Design, make and enjoy life

      Co Creator of the Zesty Nimble

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • burtoogleundefined
        burtoogle
        last edited by

        On my Kossel XL, the height map doesn't appear to correspond to reality and I am wondering if the IR sensor is being fooled due to differences in the amount of IR that gets returned at different locations. Two things make me think this:

        1. The height map I get shows a big single spike in the very centre of the bed. My bed consists of a slab of aluminium, a sheet of black paper and some glass. It really doesn't have a mm or so high bump in the middle. What it does have is two lines drawn on the black paper with a pencil that indicate the x and y axes. i.e. the lines cross in the middle of the bed. I am thinking that there's just enough pencil lead under the sensor when it probes the centre of the bed to give a different reading than the surrounding black paper.

        2. During my experiments I did some scans with the bed covered in blue tape. The heightmap showed the bed being more than 1mm higher than when the tape isn't there but the tape is less than 0.2mm thick.

        So, perhaps what you are seeing are differences in height being caused by variations in the amount of IR that is being reflected by your bed.

        I readily admit that I do not know the detail of how the IR sensor operates so this may all be complete nonsense.

        But have you tried rotating the bed?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Zesty_Lykleundefined
          Zesty_Lykle
          last edited by

          Yes I tried rotating the bed. No real change.
          I will try covering the bed with a single sheet of white, see if that makes a difference.
          Thanks for the idea.

          Lykle
          Design, make and enjoy life

          Co Creator of the Zesty Nimble

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA