Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?

Dep

@Veti said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

M557 X500:1000 Y150:600 S10

03.11.2019, 14:40:36 M557 X500:1000 Y150:600 S10
Error: M557: bad grid definition: Too many grid points; suggest increase spacing to 47.4mm

Veti

try decreasing the mesh area and see if the result improves, allowing more probing points in a smaller area.

Dep

I tried to reduce to 20mm. That helped. But now I don’t know, maybe I came across a flat section of the table?

But I need the printer to work on a large table. I don’t understand what the problem is.

Why calibration is not working? There may be some kind of configuration problem.

After all, in theory, for firmware it does not matter how uneven the bed is.

Either there are limitations in the firmware, or maybe the adjustment is not accurate and it is not visible at small values. But it becomes noticeable with a large roughness.

Veti

@Dep said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

I tried to reduce to 20mm. That helped. But now I don’t know, maybe I came across a flat section of the table?

look at the mesh calibration image to check.

Dep

If you mean to look at the program code, then unfortunately I am not good at programming.

Veti

no the image of the you see after running mesh bed compensation.

fcwilt

Hi,

Have you ever defined a probing grid that covers the entire bed?

If not would you do that, probe the bed and post the height map here?

Thanks.

Frederick

Dep

Made a calibration with the parameters: M557 X500:700 Y150:230 S20

RepRapFirmware height map file v2 generated at 2019-11-03 18:06, min error -0.633, max error -0.047, mean -0.346, deviation 0.137
xmin,xmax,ymin,ymax,radius,xspacing,yspacing,xnum,ynum
500.00,700.00,150.00,230.00,-1.00,20.00,20.00,11,5
 -0.329, -0.318, -0.282, -0.248, -0.238, -0.218, -0.195, -0.176, -0.133, -0.089, -0.047
 -0.377, -0.358, -0.342, -0.314, -0.324, -0.287, -0.280, -0.235, -0.199, -0.162, -0.118
 -0.484, -0.434, -0.434, -0.435, -0.375, -0.344, -0.337, -0.308, -0.259, -0.216, -0.163
 -0.541, -0.507, -0.491, -0.479, -0.467, -0.427, -0.433, -0.389, -0.338, -0.282, -0.226
 -0.633, -0.607, -0.580, -0.550, -0.533, -0.510, -0.484, -0.463, -0.407, -0.353, -0.298

I still can’t understand what this can give us?

Dep

@fcwilt Bed Size X1380 Y1210
I only calibrate 500 x 500

But the part fits in this size. It is inside a calibrated space.

Do you think if not the entire bed is calibrated this can cause an error? But how to do that? Maybe reduce the table and set offsets?

fcwilt

@Dep said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

@fcwilt Bed Size X1380 Y1210
I only calibrate 500 x 500

But the part fits in this size. It is inside a calibrated space.

Do you think if not the entire bed is calibrated this can cause an error? But how to do that? Maybe reduce the table and set offsets?

One height map you posted was absolutely terrible.

I just want to get picture of the entire bed as a reference.

Not having the entire bed calibrated shouldn't cause an error unless you try to print outside that area.

But there is not much point in having a large bed if you cannot use it all.

Thanks.

Frederick

Dep

@fcwilt said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

One height map you posted was absolutely terrible.
I just want to get picture of the entire bed as a reference.
Not having the entire bed calibrated shouldn't cause an error unless you try to print outside that area.
But there is not much point in having a large bed if you cannot use it all.

Now I can’t make a height map of the whole table, because glass 650 x 650 mm is fixed on the table

Yes, the bed is very crooked. But why doesn't compensation work? Does it really matter how rough the bed is?

Veti

@Dep said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

Does it really matter how rough the bed is?

with a bed as uneven as that it does.
the points in beetween probing are calculated and dont reflect what is actually there.
so if the bed is not uniformly uneven it will be off.
with it beeing off by an entire layer means this error can be significant.

Dep

Yes, I agree, but the table is made of 4mm glass. It cannot be a “spasmodic” curve. I hope I wrote correctly

Those. the glass of course bends around the table, but these are smooth bends.

fcwilt

@Dep said in Mesh calibration not working or what am I doing wrong?:

Now I can’t make a height map of the whole table, because glass 650 x 650 mm is fixed on the table

Yes, the bed is very crooked. But why doesn't compensation work? Does it really matter how rough the bed is?

I see. Have you probed the glass area? Have you posted the height map here?

If you are limited to 121 points its going to be hard to get an accurate picture of that area

Probe a 220 by 220 area in the center of the glass and post the height map please.

Frederick

Dep

Ok, did it:

RepRapFirmware height map file v2 generated at 2019-11-03 19:31, min error -1.658, max error -0.124, mean -0.815, deviation 0.349
xmin,xmax,ymin,ymax,radius,xspacing,yspacing,xnum,ynum
600.00,800.00,300.00,500.00,-1.00,20.00,20.00,11,11
 -0.817, -0.773, -0.734, -0.627, -0.614, -0.546, -0.462, -0.402, -0.332, -0.225, -0.124
 -0.884, -0.839, -0.803, -0.752, -0.669, -0.608, -0.543, -0.447, -0.357, -0.249, -0.197
 -0.951, -0.911, -0.876, -0.794, -0.727, -0.650, -0.593, -0.466, -0.392, -0.303, -0.221
 -1.018, -0.982, -0.927, -0.866, -0.784, -0.719, -0.652, -0.532, -0.477, -0.361, -0.230
 -1.112, -1.084, -1.003, -0.936, -0.846, -0.780, -0.662, -0.569, -0.475, -0.394, -0.303
 -1.191, -1.137, -1.079, -1.004, -0.908, -0.821, -0.727, -0.628, -0.552, -0.449, -0.337
 -1.293, -1.210, -1.157, -1.087, -1.000, -0.896, -0.788, -0.681, -0.595, -0.441, -0.354
 -1.398, -1.303, -1.233, -1.160, -1.062, -0.968, -0.864, -0.753, -0.645, -0.521, -0.419
 -1.490, -1.404, -1.323, -1.231, -1.137, -1.033, -0.924, -0.789, -0.704, -0.581, -0.453
 -1.544, -1.474, -1.409, -1.314, -1.201, -1.101, -0.995, -0.886, -0.752, -0.614, -0.506
 -1.658, -1.574, -1.497, -1.390, -1.277, -1.162, -1.050, -0.925, -0.774, -0.658, -0.533

Offset down because the table is not heated now

Veti

please post the images as well

Dep

Veti

if you have a sloping x gantry the probe will be at an tilt angle. this will cause errors in the measurements as well.

Phaedrux

I would suggest slowing down the probe speed of the BLTouch from 300 to 100. It's possible you're getting some bad probe points.

Are you able to manually level the bed with adjustment screws? It looks like there is a large amount of tilt.

The limited number of probe points with the older Duet board is going to make it difficult to get an accurate heightmap of such a large bed. The area between points is interpolated, but unless the surface is very flat to begin with, the risk is there for the interpolation to gloss over a defect.

Possible work around would be to modify your first layer parameters to compensate for the unevenness by using extra thick extrusion. Or perhaps using a raft.

Dep

I use M558 P9 H6 F300 T6000 R0.2 A5 B1 - where A5 - five times probe and usually it probe just 2 times, theni think bltouch work well. But i will test lower down speed of probing.

I agree that the table is very crooked and 50mm is a lot.

But look at the photo - there part of the model is at least have 3-4 points. Why is there no compensation?