Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Mesh Bed Parameters Setting

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    2
    6
    291
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • psyforundefined
      psyfor
      last edited by

      Hi,
      I am trying to get some mesh bed parameters set on my railcore. I want the the mesh to start at at X:290 and Y:5 with a spacing of 20 on the X and 70 on the Y. When I input the starting point for Y as 5 it will jump and start at 33.

      How would I set the M557 parameter to get this result?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator
        last edited by

        Please provide your M208 commands for the bed size, and your G31 command that shows your probe offsets.

        Basically, to maximize your M557 mesh grid size, you would take your M208 size minus the G31 probe offsets.

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        psyforundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • psyforundefined
          psyfor @Phaedrux
          last edited by

          @Phaedrux

          Axis limits X0.0:290.0, Y0.0:290.0, Z-0.2:280.0
          Current reading 0, threshold 25, trigger height 2.490, offsets X2.0 Y42.0

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Phaedruxundefined
            Phaedrux Moderator
            last edited by

            M557 X0:280 Y60:280 S20

            That should encompass the entire probe reachable area of your bed. I've trimmed off a little travel distance in order to evenly get 20mm spacing into the area.

            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

            psyforundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • psyforundefined
              psyfor @Phaedrux
              last edited by

              @Phaedrux Thank you. I will give it a go now.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Phaedruxundefined
                Phaedrux Moderator
                last edited by

                I guess for X and Y you could split the difference and use M557 X5:285 Y50:290 S20 instead. That's a bit more optimised. Gets you an extra row of points in the Y direction and centers the X points a bit better.

                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA