• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Testing Resolution / accuracy , Your results wanted! Z Probe Results

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Tuning and tweaking
22
84
14.3k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Russ Gries
    last edited by 18 Apr 2017, 22:32

    and now we are losing it…

    M558 P1 X0 Y0 Z1 H10 F1000 T10000 I1
    

    [c]3:30:41 PM
    M98 P0:/macros/probetesting/Probe Testing Single Point 36 probes P values .gcode
    Bed probe heights: -0.009 -0.019 -0.009 -0.015 -0.006 -0.012 -0.012 -0.019 -0.009 -0.015 -0.019 -0.019 -0.015 -0.015 -0.019 -0.009 -0.015 -0.009 -0.012 -0.019 -0.015 -0.015 -0.019 -0.012 -0.015 -0.019 -0.019 -0.015 -0.019 -0.015 -0.019 -0.012 -0.012 -0.015 -0.012 -0.012, mean -0.015, deviation from mean 0.004
    3:30:02 PM
    M98 P0:/macros/probetesting/Probe Testing Single Point 36 probes P values .gcode
    Bed probe heights: -0.006 -0.003 -0.012 -0.006 -0.006 -0.009 -0.012 -0.019 -0.009 -0.009 -0.009 -0.012 -0.009 -0.015 -0.009 -0.012 -0.012 -0.012 -0.012 -0.012 -0.015 -0.009 -0.009 -0.012 -0.015 -0.012 -0.015 -0.009 -0.015 -0.012 -0.019 -0.009 -0.015 -0.009 -0.012 -0.019, mean -0.012, deviation from mean 0.004[/c]

    One Day At A Time…
    My Main Research Page:
    http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Russ Gries
      last edited by 18 Apr 2017, 22:34

      so for me contact to contact above 500mm/min we start getting out of a nice range.

      ~Russ

      One Day At A Time…
      My Main Research Page:
      http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        DjDemonD
        last edited by 18 Apr 2017, 22:54

        @Russ:

        @DjDemonD:

        I will try to find the time to do an electrical contact test on this printer for a baseline. Plus looking at the data for microswitches, of which some did very well, the issue here is you are deploying them by servo, in the real world? So how do they do on repeatability from one run to the next? This is the reason I love piezo, its permanently mounted. If you attach a microswitch to probe then remove it afterwards, how repeatable is that between runs?

        Maybe add a third test probe, home, probe, home etc…

        yeah i wanted to do a home probe home probe test but that is i think for another day… because then your adding the tolerance of your homing switches. its more than i wanted to test at first.

        If we all set up a contact contact and got a 0 deviation... we could then test the accuracy of our Homing... ( however i cant even get a 0 deviation even when running very slow)

        if anyone has a servo controlled micro switch probe do please test. i think that we will find a lot of error in that.
        for me tho i want a direct switch with the hot end. like your piezo system.

        there are already deigns out there like this.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e119OXzkk7s
        but, like i said with a micro switch you have to back it off x amount and that means that you need a part that moves a lot more than lets say your piezo system. this means there is more chance for error and your nozzle moving around while printing.

        there are micro switches that dont need much movement, but nothing like a FSR or the piezo system. where you can basically hard mount everything but know that you are measuring this force…

        dose anyone own a seemecnc rig with the accelerator probe??? That i do want data for!!

        ~Russ

        It would be nice to have an endstop repeatability test of some sort? Any ideas?

        Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
        www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
        PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          kraegar
          last edited by 19 Apr 2017, 12:29

          @Russ:

          @kraegar:

          Separating probe accuracy from printer build accuracy is tough to do. On my delta I'm fighting a mechanical issue right now which makes any sort of probe repeatability tests futile, as it quickly falls into the noise of the printer itself (I have a bearing or something that's gone out, makes a grinding noise during some moves, but for the life of me I can't track it down yet)

          In addition, if you're probing two points at any distance apart, then you're actually adding your current calibration accuracy into the probe data, since you're really comparing against the currently calculated plane.

          This is correct. this is why i wanted only a single point. even when moving around the point is still 0,0

          do you have a motor bearing bearing out? take off the tension and wiggle the shaft… or turn it and see if you hear and noises??

          even with your error, can you run the tests, just for fun then again after you find the problem. just to see if it even changed anything?

          I will not add the data till after you find the problem, but just for fun sounds interesting to see how much it is effecting your setup ?

          ~Russ

          My printer is partially dismantled to find the source of the grinding sound, and to do some work on my piezo probe setup. Once I find the time to work on it again I'll try and run your tests.

          Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
          https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            DjDemonD
            last edited by 19 Apr 2017, 14:02

            Just been thinking about the endstop test. The issue is reference points isn't it? Since the endstop is the reference point for the axis the only way to test it would be to create a hard limit somewhere, for example with rails, clamping something onto the rail say 5-10cm from the endstop, then moving the carriage/s manually to sit against the hard clamp point, then homing and then move back under power to the hard stop noting the distance travelled. Repeat this process 20-30 times and you have an endstop repeatability measure which is not dependant on the sensor at the other end of the travel (in the case of a delta say). Sure you could do this potentially with endstops at either end of the axis, but I have never had this setup even when I had a pure cartesian machine, and I certainly don't now I have 2 delta's and a corexy.

            You could then swap in a different endstop - Idris has a piezo endstop system in the works which I'd love to compare to microswitches and opticals.

            Can anyone think of any easier way to do it?

            Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
            www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
            PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Russ Gries
              last edited by 19 Apr 2017, 23:15

              I think the best thing to do is just test it agents its self.

              that's kinda what your doing on the Z probe. ( home > test distance from home > check against the average)

              so, for fun you could home the printer, disconnected Z probe, connect the end stop in its place, reverse the motor. and send the same z probe commands. This would tell you how repeatable "going home" is…

              you could probably do all this in software configuration with out ever moving a wire around...

              just some ideas for you to chew on 🙂

              ~Russ

              One Day At A Time…
              My Main Research Page:
              http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Russ Gries
                last edited by 19 Apr 2017, 23:16

                @kraegar:

                My printer is partially dismantled to find the source of the grinding sound, and to do some work on my piezo probe setup. Once I find the time to work on it again I'll try and run your tests.

                cool thanks ! I hope you find your problem!.

                ~Russ

                One Day At A Time…
                My Main Research Page:
                http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  DjDemonD
                  last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 09:12

                  Okay sorry I will make a new thread about endstops, this isnt really the right place.

                  I have a DC42 IR sensor, and would be happy to (maybe this is controversial given my pushing piezo tech) run it through your test gcodes. However I would be willing to suggest having used it extensively before going to piezo, that if the bed is clean and evenly reflective it will perform very well but given a bit of ABS glue/hairspray etc it will perform far less impressively. The issue with all of this testing is its between lab testing and the real world, the lab testing for microswitches and IR sensors shows/will show amazing results but how well do they repeat this performance when printing object after object in the real world that's what I'm interested in, and thats what I am so pleased with the piezo approach, in the real world once they are setup they perform amazingly well and keep on doing so, plus they nozzle based so no offsets to be compensated for, no tilt etc….

                  Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                  www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                  PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    Sabagmn
                    last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 16:03

                    Here are my results with a modified design of DC42's IR probe. Pretty happy with the results. With this design I don't have to worry about my print bed, which it doesn't do well on directly (glass/PEI).

                    17:12:51
                    Bed probe heights: 0.012 0.012 0.006 0.008 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.010 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.018 0.019 0.014 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.018 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.018 0.019 0.015 0.017 0.019, mean 0.014, deviation from mean 0.003
                    17:16:28
                    Bed probe heights: 0.015 0.021 0.013 0.018 0.019 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.015 0.018 0.015 0.017 0.014 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.015 0.020 0.017 0.016 0.017 0.014 0.019 0.014 0.016 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.015 0.018 0.016 0.018 0.015 0.020, mean 0.017, deviation from mean 0.002

                    17:30:00
                    Bed probe heights: 0.011 0.023 0.025 0.015 0.011 0.014 0.014 0.020 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.024 0.016 0.012 0.013 0.017 0.005 0.008 0.020 0.015 0.021 0.012, mean 0.015, deviation from mean 0.005
                    17:36:01
                    Bed probe heights: 0.013 0.020 0.012 0.010 0.017 0.024 0.010 0.014 0.012 0.013 0.018 0.012 0.006 0.024 0.019 0.008 0.011 0.012 0.008 0.012 0.013 0.018 0.015 0.012 0.015, mean 0.014, deviation from mean 0.005

                    This is the setup: http://photos.gerbers.us/FullScreenSlideShow.aspx?gallery=4808337&mt=Photo

                    Don't mind all the other stuff. Currently testing out different options for the Z probe, lol

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Russ Gries
                      last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 16:29

                      @Sabagmn:

                      Here are my results with a modified design of DC42's IR probe. Pretty happy with the results. With this design I don't have to worry about my print bed, which it doesn't do well on directly (glass/PEI).

                      This is the setup: http://photos.gerbers.us/FullScreenSlideShow.aspx?gallery=4808337&mt=Photo

                      Don't mind all the other stuff. Currently testing out different options for the Z probe, lol

                      nice work. that basically just like hall-effect but your is better, Due to the way the rod is held in place. mine is a bit sloppy. you like like you have the proper slide guides in there..

                      your data added to the workbook.

                      Higher rezhttp://open-source-energy.org/rwg42985/russ/Projects/3D%20printer/micro%20switch%20Z%20probe%20Data/Bed%20Probes%20accuracy%20others%20added.jpg

                      what steps are you using? and what Duet board? yours looks like a Cartesian correct?

                      Thanks for Probing!!!

                      ~Russ

                      One Day At A Time…
                      My Main Research Page:
                      http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        Sabagmn
                        last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 16:36

                        You're welcome.
                        I use the Duet WiFi with 16 micro steps and 256 steps interpolation. And yes it's a cartesian.
                        Also that slide guide is just a repurposed ball bearing. Works well enough though.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          DjDemonD
                          last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 17:08

                          I like that idea that's very similar to Nebbian's deployable delta probe http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1517363 except he just uses an optical endstop so saving himself £25.

                          Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                          www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                          PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            Russ Gries
                            last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 17:20

                            in case you guys did not watch my other video here is what i'm using now. but i have some intresting ideas to play wth with this type of rig…
                            OLD VIDEO
                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80qzmwDFGVc

                            PS. waiting for it to go live… http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2260909
                            ~RUSS

                            One Day At A Time…
                            My Main Research Page:
                            http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              Sabagmn
                              last edited by 20 Apr 2017, 17:57

                              @DjDemonD:

                              I like that idea that's very similar to Nebbian's deployable delta probe http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1517363 except he just uses an optical endstop so saving himself £25.

                              The original design I based this on also used an optical endstop. But I already had the IR sensor, so I figured I may as well use it. Especially too since I can run it in analog mode.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                DjDemonD
                                last edited by 21 Apr 2017, 04:06

                                I also like the fact that Nebbian's probe deploys by servo but isn't positioned by the servo, and it deploys below the nozzle avoiding offsets and tilt problems.

                                Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                                www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                                PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • undefined
                                  Yonkiman
                                  last edited by 21 Apr 2017, 19:37

                                  Here are the results from my Voron CoreXY which uses a "small white and black micro switch with the label TIAIHUA" as the nozzle-contact Z switch:

                                  36 points moving

                                  Bed probe heights: 0.053 0.060 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.060 0.062 0.060 0.060 0.058 0.055 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.055 0.058 0.058 0.060 0.058 0.058 0.062, mean 0.058, deviation from mean 0.003

                                  Bed probe heights: 0.070 0.065 0.062 0.067 0.065 0.065 0.062 0.065 0.067 0.067 0.067 0.070 0.065 0.070 0.067 0.070 0.070 0.070 0.067 0.073 0.073 0.070 0.073 0.075 0.073, mean 0.068, deviation from mean 0.003

                                  Single Point Static

                                  Bed probe heights: 0.028 0.037 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.037 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040, mean 0.040, deviation from mean 0.002

                                  Bed probe heights: 0.040 0.050 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.050 0.053 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.050 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.053 0.050 0.053 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050, mean 0.051, deviation from mean 0.002

                                  Was interesting to see the results plotted:

                                  Seems to need a few attempts before it "warms up" and becomes very repeatable.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    Sabagmn
                                    last edited by 21 Apr 2017, 20:04

                                    I hooked up my servo controlled switch for comparison to my IR setup and here are the results:

                                    Static
                                    21:17:00
                                    Bed probe heights: -0.005 -0.012 -0.015 -0.015 -0.018 -0.017 -0.021 -0.022 -0.022 -0.024 -0.024 -0.024 -0.026 -0.026 -0.025 -0.026 -0.027 -0.026 -0.026 -0.027 -0.027 -0.027 -0.028 -0.027 -0.027 -0.027 -0.027 -0.026 -0.028 -0.024 -0.028 -0.026 -0.028 -0.028 -0.026 -0.028, mean -0.024, deviation from mean 0.005
                                    21:21:50
                                    Bed probe heights: -0.015 -0.019 -0.018 -0.021 -0.018 -0.021 -0.021 -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 -0.020 -0.021 -0.019 -0.020 -0.022 -0.023 -0.020 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.024 -0.024 -0.023 -0.023 -0.023 -0.018 -0.023, mean -0.021, deviation from mean 0.002

                                    Moving
                                    21:36:20
                                    Bed probe heights: -0.054 -0.054 -0.051 -0.048 -0.038 -0.053 -0.046 -0.056 -0.058 -0.053 -0.051 -0.061 -0.059 -0.052 -0.054 -0.051 -0.053 -0.046 -0.055 -0.052 -0.059 -0.062 -0.058 -0.050 -0.053, mean -0.053, deviation from mean 0.005
                                    21:45:09
                                    Bed probe heights: -0.044 -0.054 -0.050 -0.041 -0.051 -0.049 -0.049 -0.045 -0.048 -0.049 -0.049 -0.048 -0.045 -0.048 -0.055 -0.047 -0.043 -0.047 -0.043 -0.043 -0.048 -0.049 -0.040 -0.038 -0.043, mean -0.047, deviation from mean 0.004

                                    This setup and switch: https://youtu.be/o2jY9fycSa0
                                    http://photos.gerbers.us/FullScreenSlideShow.aspx?gallery=4808439&mt=Photo

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      Russ Gries
                                      last edited by 24 Apr 2017, 17:28

                                      @Yonkiman:

                                      Here are the results from my Voron CoreXY which uses a "small white and black micro switch with the label TIAIHUA" as the nozzle-contact Z switch:

                                      Seems to need a few attempts before it "warms up" and becomes very repeatable.

                                      great results, it basically matches my other micro switches, that means your rig is quite solid and the way its build works good.

                                      do you have some photos / information on how its set up? i would lie to see how its built.

                                      Thanks for your results!

                                      ~Russ

                                      One Day At A Time…
                                      My Main Research Page:
                                      http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        Russ Gries
                                        last edited by 24 Apr 2017, 17:42

                                        @Sabagmn:

                                        I hooked up my servo controlled switch for comparison to my IR setup and here are the results:

                                        interesting, its a bit more sloppy. but very close. still way good i think…

                                        i would like to see you do a contact contact test... see if you can pull off a perfect score...
                                        Or if you have some slop in that Cartesian... 🙂

                                        here are the results of both the last 2 entry's.

                                        any other takers... please post results.
                                        the more data i ( we) have the better idea we have of types of probes... and printers. + errors

                                        your data added to the workbook.

                                        Higher rez http://open-source-energy.org/rwg42985/russ/Projects/3D%20printer/micro%20switch%20Z%20probe%20Data/Bed%20Probes%20accuracy%20others%20added.jpg

                                        by the way if you guys look at the spreed sheet there is plots for each run like Yonkiman posted….

                                        and it is interesting so see the plot.

                                        i have also seen where the first probe or 2 is off but then flat lines , kinda interesting.

                                        ~Russ

                                        [h]MORE TESTING PLEASE 🙂 [/h]

                                        One Day At A Time…
                                        My Main Research Page:
                                        http://rwgresearch.com/open-projects/3d-printing-research/

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          leadinglights
                                          last edited by 25 Apr 2017, 17:28

                                          I would like to be able to contribute some data for under-bed piezo sensors but unfortunately the cost of the Duet3D prevents me from doing so at the moment. I suspect from oscilloscope and logic analyzer traces that it is at least in the 1 micron region but Arduino/Ramps/Repetier firmware only reports to 0.01mm. Of course, if anybody knows how I can coax Repetier firmware to report G30 either to 0.001mm or in raw Z stepper steps I may be able to give you the data

                                          Mike

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          38 out of 84
                                          • First post
                                            38/84
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA