Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Baby Stepping.. can it, or can it not be permanent?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    21
    80
    11.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jens55undefined
      jens55
      last edited by

      Interesting .... this appears to be another , different , problem though.
      Note that in my example the Z compensation jumped from 4.150 mm to 162.85 mm which has likely nothing to do with the bed mesh compensation (way too large). Also, in your example it seems to happen consistently and in my example it does not.
      Does G29 S2 disable (as in temporarily) the mesh compensation or does it toss the bed mesh map (that takes me around 3 hours to run) completely?
      In your modified macro, is mesh bed compensation turned back on anywhere else as it doesn't appear to be turned on in the macro?

      I will not have time to dig into this today ... possibly tomorrow.

      As for doing it multiple times - in my case I adjusted Z offset, saved it and later determined that I needed to tweak it a bit and saved it again.
      Saving during a print comes naturally just as you tweak the babysteps during a print (well for me it does)

      fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fcwiltundefined
        fcwilt @jens55
        last edited by

        @jens55

        G20 S2 just disables mesh comp - it does not delete the height map file.

        Frederick

        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jens55undefined
          jens55
          last edited by

          Thanks !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jens55undefined
            jens55
            last edited by

            So another possible issue .... the babystep offset shown by DWC is not correct if you did a re-home while there was an offset already set. I do not know if the macro grabs the same value as the offset that is displayed in the DWC panel or if it grabs the 'true' machine value. For that matter I do not know what the 'true' machine value would be ... all I know is that it is a moving target and under certain circumstances it can be well out of whack.
            I need to explore this a bit further .... but not today.

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @jens55
              last edited by

              @jens55

              Hi,

              Homing and bed probing used to reset baby stepping. From the docs:

              In RepRapFirmware 1.19 and earlier, the babystepping offset is reset to zero when the printer is homed or the bed is probed. In RepRapFirmware 1.21 and later, homing and bed probing don't reset babystepping, but you can reset it explicitly using M290 R0 S0.

              Just to be safe I cancel baby stepping and mesh compensation before homing and probing.

              Frederick

              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              jens55undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • botundefined
                bot
                last edited by

                Just a reminder: when there is babystepping active and you home the z axis, the babystepping value will be added to the z axis position -- and the babystepping won't be cancelled! It's a double trouble scenario.

                *not actually a robot

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Kolbiundefined
                  Kolbi
                  last edited by Kolbi

                  During a long run this morning, I thought about this macro...
                  What I think was happen is that after M290 R0 S0 was issued - that fixed refiguring an additional Z-offset, but because M290 R0 S0 actually moves the nozzle back - unless it is homed directly after, the change is not evident and then it because a death roll because the user sees it as still needing adjustment because the the new G31 has not been used yet (homed).

                  Cheers,
                  Kolbi

                  ; 0:/macros/Save-Z
                  ; This macro subtracts the current babystep offset to the Z trigger height and lets the user
                  ; know what to change the G31 command in 0:/sys/config.g to. If you are using multiple filament settings,
                  ; and this is for a specific filament type, recommend placing this yielded information in the filament's config.g.
                  	 
                  
                  if state.status != "processing"                                     ; Printer is not currently printing!
                  
                     if move.axes[2].babystep !=0                                     ; If no babysteps are currently adjusted - exit routine
                        echo {"OLD: " ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight ^ " NEW: " ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep}
                        echo {"Edit the G31 command in your config.g to the new Z offset as: G31 Z" ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep}
                        M291 P{"Set probe offset to " ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep ^ ", clear babysteps, and REHOME Z?"} R"!WARNING! Do not proceed if printing!" S3
                        G31 Z{sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep} ; set G31 Z offset to corrected
                        M500 P10:31                                                    ; save settings to config-overide.g - G31 P31 saves trigger height
                        M290 R0 S0                                                     ; set babystep to 0mm absolute
                        G28                                                            ; home all
                        M291 P"Ensure M501 exists in 0:/sys/config, or manually edit the G31 Z setting, to make this change permanent." R"Note on making change permanent." S3 
                     else
                        echo "Baby stepping is not currently active, nothing to do."
                  
                  else
                     M291 P"This would be detrimental to ongoing print, aborting."  S3
                  
                  jens55undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jens55undefined
                    jens55 @fcwilt
                    last edited by

                    @fcwilt said in Baby Stepping.. can it, or can it not be permanent?:

                    In RepRapFirmware 1.19 and earlier, the babystepping offset is reset to zero when the printer is homed or the bed is probed. In RepRapFirmware 1.21 and later, homing and bed probing don't reset babystepping, but you can reset it explicitly using M290 R0 S0.

                    Yes, I came to that conclusion as well and the M290 command will go into my homez.g file.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jens55undefined
                      jens55 @Kolbi
                      last edited by

                      @Kolbi said in Baby Stepping.. can it, or can it not be permanent?:

                      During a long run this morning, I thought about this macro...
                      What I think was happen is that after M290 R0 S0 was issued - that fixed refiguring an additional Z-offset, but because M290 R0 S0 actually moves the nozzle back - unless it is homed directly after, the change is not evident and then it because a death roll because the user sees it as still needing adjustment because the the new G31 has not been used yet (homed).

                      I don't quite understand that yet but it sounds like a plausible explanation if it were not for the increase from a z offset of 4.5 to about 165 (see earlier in this thread) in one jump. That large jump is still unexplained in my mind.

                      Kolbiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Kolbiundefined
                        Kolbi @jens55
                        last edited by Kolbi

                        @jens55 This is what I believe was happening with the previous version.
                        -User adjusts babysteps
                        -User uses script/macro to 'save' babystep
                        -Macro takes current offset - babystep and executes G31
                        -Macro then resets babystep to 0, this also physically moves Z
                        -Macro saves this to config-override.g
                        -User now understands some stuff happened, but sees that Z still has to be adjusted (because it is right back to where it was before this evolution started)
                        -User starts this process again, from the beginning step, which compounds the offset - this is because after each run, G31 is recalculated from the last saved, but the user sees no effect so keeps the spiral going.

                        The new version makes you re-home, so the change is evident and stops the spiral down.

                        jens55undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jens55undefined
                          jens55 @Kolbi
                          last edited by

                          @Kolbi , I respectfully disagree.
                          I don't think that resetting the babystep value to 0 physically moves Z ..... but it wouldn't totally surprise me.
                          The main reason I disagree though is based on the fact that about 30 minutes ago I started a print job, re-homed z (which now also sets babysteps to zero), started the print job, adjusted babysteps to the right amount as the print job was running, executed save z, got a proper response for the new offset value but the printer now thinks that the z offset is something like 450 mm. The babystep value was around -0.40 and the offset in config.g is around 3.8 or so. There is no way that anything I heard so far can explain this short of a bug in the new conditional code / object model.
                          This also happened on the very first save cycle (first time it did that on the first save)!!!!!
                          I have a gut feeling that it is related to doing the save while a print is in progress.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Kolbiundefined
                            Kolbi
                            last edited by Kolbi

                            @jens55 That does sound odd.
                            This morning before leaving my house, I homed my printer and then babystepped .2mm up. Then in console I issued 'M290 R0 S0' and it did move the Z axis.
                            Was the above scenario done with the latest script I just posted or a previous version?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jens55undefined
                              jens55
                              last edited by

                              No, it was done with the original script with babystep resetting enabled in the script as well babystep reset after homing z.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jens55undefined
                                jens55
                                last edited by

                                I have escalated this issue to DC42. Hopefully he can chime in on what is happening.

                                https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/18100/dc42-please-read

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA