M81 command RRF 3.3

uneumann36

Hey guys , short Question,
does anyone know what´s wrong with this message?

Error: in GCode file line 194152 column 8: M81: expected number after 's'

Finished printing file 0:/gcodes/CFFFP_Copy of Diamond_Hotend_CapProx_wFan.gcode, print time was 2h 30m

In the past the automatic switch of the printer after printing with M81 command works fine.
But now anymore.

So what´s wrong???
The command with Hand via display works fine.

uneumann36

Hi, is there anyone who knows the cause?

jay_s_uk

@uneumann36 whats in your end gcode?

uneumann36

I am just at work.
So something like - set bed temp to 50 degress , if reached M81
I don´t changed settings (start and endcode) it is since a half year same.
But since 2 weeks i get this failure message.

If print is ending, extruder drive home, bed temp setting goes to 50 degress, if 50 degrees is reached the failure above is coming.

jay_s_uk

@uneumann36 best of posting your end gcode.
Theres no documented changes for M81 but it doesn't hurt to check what you're sending

uneumann36

@jay_s_uk

Ok, here is my cura start code :

M80
G28 ;Home
G92 E0 ;Reset Extruder
G1 Z2.0 F3000 ;Move Z Axis up
G1 X5.1 Y20 Z0.28 F5000.0 ;Move to start position
G1 X5.1 Y200.0 Z0.28 F1500.0 E15 ;Draw the first line
G1 X5.4 Y200.0 Z0.28 F5000.0 ;Move to side a little
G1 X5.4 Y20 Z0.28 F1500.0 E30 ;Draw the second line
G92 E0 ;Reset Extruder
G1 E4 F300 ; Extrude 4mm of Filament
G1 Z2.0 F3000 ;Move Z Axis up

And here the end code :

M104 S0
M140 S0
;Retract the filament
G92 E1
G1 E-1 F300
G28 X0 Y0
M84
M190 R50.000000
M81 abschalten ; Herunterfahren Netzteil

Hope this helps to identify my problem.

jay_s_uk

@uneumann36 said in M81 command RRF 3.3:

M81 abschalten

There's your issue. The word abschalten is before the comment indicator ;
I think gcode parsing has been improved which is why this now thrown as an error.
Remove it or move the ; to the left of it

uneumann36

@jay_s_uk
Thank´s , i will try it.
But i never change the end code, and it works in the past !

uneumann36

Yeah, it works!

I do not know why it also work in the past.

Anyway, thank you !

dc42

@uneumann36 there was a change to GCode parsing. Previously, if a parameter letter was not followed by a number when a number was expected, zero was assumed. The parsing has been tightened up so that an error is flagged instead. I've added this to the upgrade notes for RRF 3.3.

uneumann36

@dc42
Thank you DC , now i understand why this happens now !