setting the temperature using 12864 mini

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 I downloaded 3.4 b7+5 from your link. There are no changes. The heating of the bed is still not activated.

[oliof]

@dc42 credit goes to @Vladimir_U -- I just confirmed and raised the flag (-:

[dc42]

@oliof @Vladimir_U please try RRF 3.4b7+6 which is now at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i5vox3xmkd55gaz/AAC19mI0WEC5GmEjLOBRbKs-a?dl=0.

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 Yes, the bed is fine now. But the heater of the tool head stopped working.

there was also a strange driver error

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 I found two more bugs. It is possible to go into negative values in heating the bed and in adjusting the flow.

[dc42]

@vladimir_u said in setting the temperature using 12864 mini:

@dc42 Yes, the bed is fine now. But the heater of the tool head stopped working.

When I looked at at the code I found that it was automatically selecting the tool whenever you tried to adjust the heater temperatures. This was a bad thing to do for two reasons:

• It was not running the tool change files
• On a multi-tool machine you might want to adjust the active temperature of a tool while another tool was printing

So I removed that automatic tool selection. If you have a single-tool machine, you may wish to put a T0 command at the end of config.g.

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 Hello. When adding T0 to the config.g everything works well. But the problem with negative values and drivers is still relevant.

[Phaedrux]

I think the driver error message has been fixed in the latest updated beta 7+7

[dc42]

@vladimir_u said in setting the temperature using 12864 mini:

@dc42 Hello. When adding T0 to the config.g everything works well. But the problem with negative values and drivers is still relevant.

Do you think that is a new issue, or has it always been present? Is it a problem?

[oliof]

@dc42 it's a new issue.

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 I can say with confidence that the problem with negative temperatures was on the stable release 3.3

[dc42]

@vladimir_u said in setting the temperature using 12864 mini:

@dc42 I can say with confidence that the problem with negative temperatures was on the stable release 3.3

What exactly is the problem?

[Vladimir_U]

@dc42 I'm sorry, maybe I'm translating some phrases incorrectly. English is not my native language. For me, "problem" and "issue" are words with the same meaning. In my understanding, negative temperature and negative flow value cannot be in the physical sense. And the ability to set these parameters from the printer screen seems unreasonable. Whether this is a problem or a issue I can't say for sure. I would say it's a trouble.

[Phaedrux]

Does anything bad happen when you select a negative range?

[Vladimir_U]

@phaedrux No, nothing bad is happening