• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

bed leveling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Tuning and tweaking
3
4
148
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    rister502dad
    last edited by 5 Apr 2023, 22:07

    Hi I am stuck trying to print on a not so level surface and am wondering if it is possible with this profile? Its not great but I would think it should be workable. Seems like the probe is accurate

    9fba5772-86d0-457a-af7b-dafd85c326e1-image.png

    With the way I am leveling, it doesn't appear possible. Here is my leveling macro:

    ;my levelz macro
    M561
    G1 Z5 F500
    G31 P1000 X0 Y0 Z-2.3
    M558 P8 C"e0stop" H3 F100 T4000 S1 A5 R0.7
    M557 X40:290 Y40:175 S50
    G29

    Are there other critical parameters I am missing to further optimize this? I carefully calibrated the nozzle position from z probe sensor position. I am using the E3D toolchanger on a home built corexy.

    As you can see its not workable
    2e7ac910-585f-4666-a1c9-4dda5ee9f934-image.png

    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 6 Apr 2023, 07:08 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Phaedrux Moderator
      last edited by 6 Apr 2023, 04:18

      Is that the full extent of your probes reach in that heightmap?

      @rister502dad said in bed leveling:

      G31 P1000 X0 Y0 Z-2.3
      M558 P8 C"e0stop" H3 F100 T4000 S1 A5 R0.7

      G31 must come after M558.

      What firmware version are you running?
      Can you post your full config.g and homing files?
      Can you send M122 and M98 P"config.g" in the console and copy and paste the results here?

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        dc42 administrators @rister502dad
        last edited by dc42 4 Jun 2023, 07:11 6 Apr 2023, 07:08

        @rister502dad you would benefit from using a finer mesh. Try halving the grid spacing so that is is smaller than the undulations that you are trying to compensate for.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          rister502dad
          last edited by 6 Apr 2023, 19:08

          Thanks for the suggestions, I ended up getting a thicker and flatter garolite sheet. The printer can cover a bigger area but I was just using a section of it for saving time while trying to optimize

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          1 out of 4
          • First post
            1/4
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA