Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    bed leveling

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    3
    4
    148
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rister502dadundefined
      rister502dad
      last edited by

      Hi I am stuck trying to print on a not so level surface and am wondering if it is possible with this profile? Its not great but I would think it should be workable. Seems like the probe is accurate

      9fba5772-86d0-457a-af7b-dafd85c326e1-image.png

      With the way I am leveling, it doesn't appear possible. Here is my leveling macro:

      ;my levelz macro
      M561
      G1 Z5 F500
      G31 P1000 X0 Y0 Z-2.3
      M558 P8 C"e0stop" H3 F100 T4000 S1 A5 R0.7
      M557 X40:290 Y40:175 S50
      G29 
      

      Are there other critical parameters I am missing to further optimize this? I carefully calibrated the nozzle position from z probe sensor position. I am using the E3D toolchanger on a home built corexy.

      As you can see its not workable
      2e7ac910-585f-4666-a1c9-4dda5ee9f934-image.png

      dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator
        last edited by

        Is that the full extent of your probes reach in that heightmap?

        @rister502dad said in bed leveling:

        G31 P1000 X0 Y0 Z-2.3
        M558 P8 C"e0stop" H3 F100 T4000 S1 A5 R0.7

        G31 must come after M558.

        What firmware version are you running?
        Can you post your full config.g and homing files?
        Can you send M122 and M98 P"config.g" in the console and copy and paste the results here?

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dc42undefined
          dc42 administrators @rister502dad
          last edited by dc42

          @rister502dad you would benefit from using a finer mesh. Try halving the grid spacing so that is is smaller than the undulations that you are trying to compensate for.

          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • rister502dadundefined
            rister502dad
            last edited by

            Thanks for the suggestions, I ended up getting a thicker and flatter garolite sheet. The printer can cover a bigger area but I was just using a section of it for saving time while trying to optimize

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • First post
              Last post
            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA