• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Input Shaping evaluation help needed

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
General Discussion
5
10
474
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    gringo
    last edited by 2 Nov 2023, 16:38

    Hey there,
    Can someone explain to me which input shaper I should use and how I can get rid of the frequencies below 30Hz.

    Input Shaper.JPG
    InputShaper ZVDDD.JPG

    Or do I have a mechanical problem?

    Thanks all

    undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 2 Nov 2023, 17:21 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      droftarts administrators @gringo
      last edited by 2 Nov 2023, 17:21

      @gringo Some context would be useful. I'm guessing this is a delta machine? Looks like ZVDDD is doing a good job of removing a major resonant frequency across all the axes. Probably just the natural harmonic of your machine, as it's seen on all axes at a specific frequency, so not a mechanical problem. But I'm not an expert on IS!

      Ian

      Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        gringo
        last edited by 2 Nov 2023, 17:57

        My Printer is a Core XY

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          gringo
          last edited by 4 Nov 2023, 06:15

          I have another question.
          Where can I adjust speeds and acceleration for Input Shaping?
          Imthink different speeds and accelerations needs different Input Shaper frequencies.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            dc42 administrators @gringo
            last edited by 4 Nov 2023, 06:51

            @gringo the frequencies below 30Hz may be artefacts from the movement you are using when you capture the data. Try capturing data after the movement has stopped, by unchecking the box that says capture data over the whole move.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 4 Nov 2023, 08:27 Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              gringo @dc42
              last edited by 4 Nov 2023, 08:27

              @dc42

              thanks, I will try it and post the results.

              But which speeds and accelerations are used for Input Shaping?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                gringo
                last edited by 4 Nov 2023, 11:39

                Here are the next measurements
                Rocord Motion Profile.JPG MZV@85Hz.JPG ZVD@85Hz.JPG ZVDD@85Hz.JPG ZVDDD@85Hz.JPG EI2@85Hz.JPG EI3@85Hz.JPG

                What now? I don't know what to set.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  gringo
                  last edited by 4 Nov 2023, 13:10

                  Here is a photo from a actual print.
                  Tested different Shaper, started with ei2@56Hz --> zvddd@57Hz --> zvddd@80Hz.

                  I can´t see any difference.

                  IMG_4197.jpg

                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 5 Nov 2023, 04:44 Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    ctilley79 @gringo
                    last edited by 5 Nov 2023, 04:44

                    @gringo those are short segments where input shaping is not being applied. 3.5 RC1 attempted to fix that but I’ve found that there are still moves where input shaping is ignored. My understanding is RRF’s input shaping may receive another overhaul after 3.5 is released.

                    For that reason I installed klipper on my duet boards and can confirm klipper does not have the same limitations. I look forward to coming back to RRF because overall, I do love RRF much better and the hardware is just much higher quality. My goal however is to print faster without the reduction in quality, and right now klipper provides that with exceptional results.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      gringo
                      last edited by 5 Nov 2023, 04:59

                      Thank you for the execution,

                      I have two other printers with Duet Boards where I print slower and with much less acceleration.

                      I have not tested Klipper yet, but I am planning to build the next printer and run it with Klipper to have a comparison.

                      I printed the VZ Cupe at 100mm/s with 5K ACC of the outer perimeter.
                      Reducing the acceleration of the outer perimeter to 2K at 100mm/s has brought significant improvement.

                      In my opinion, I should also be able to select the speed and acceleration in the selection window for Input Shaper as the frequencies change at different speeds and accelerations.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      6 out of 10
                      • First post
                        6/10
                        Last post
                      Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA