Test cube is half the size it should be on test print.

fcwilt

Perhaps you inadvertently told the slicer to scale the print?

Frederick

P.S. And I see you are still using bed.g instead of mesh.g

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt no check and told it to print 20mm on all axis. Using cura.!

fcwilt

told it to print 20mm on all axis. Using cura.

What do you mean by "told it"?

Normally the STL you slice determines the size.

If the STL is not too big post it here.

Thanks?

Frederick

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt
I ment to say I double checked it. The stl says it's 20mm all sides.
See picture. This is the stick test cubes size.

ecnsupplies

fcwilt

OK. I don't use CURA but I fired it up and saw what you were talking about.

So that would seem to leave your duet configuration wrong as the problem BUT you verified movement by measuring.

From the DWC console execute a M579 and see what it repots.

Frederick

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt
Made a test pattern to measure 25mm on each axis and jogged to each. They are exact.

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt
One forum said it might be z accep and jerk are to high. Any clue were this would be?

ecnsupplies

M579. Axis scale factors x1.000, y:1.000 z:1.000

fcwilt

So M587 is not the culprit either.

I don't think your acceleration or "jerk" settings are too high. They are higher than mine but I don't think it would drastically affect the size.

Frederick

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt
Duet recommend cura so that's what I installed.

fcwilt

CURA is fine based on the large numbers of users.

I just never could get good prints out of it using it's typical settings.

Since my "goto" slicer works for me I have never taken to the time to work with CURA to get good results.

Frederick

ecnsupplies

@fcwilt
I downloaded a different slicer and will run it tonight just so I can say I did.
Let you know tomorrow