Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Plug-in Idea

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    2
    3
    187
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • br7408undefined
      br7408
      last edited by br7408

      I know Dave is already hard at work on the newest input shaper, because I've already seen the 3.6 references in the Duet library.

      I had a thought... not sure how realistic it is.

      So typically the slicer will import the print g-code to DWC.

      What if there was a DWC plug-in that conditionally analyzed the G-code of the imported project,
      and filtered each short move below x value, and reduced the F value of that particular move? I guess it could even have filterable variables to discriminate short move distance and axis range of the move... Instead of IS simply not being applied, the feed rate simply slows down instead to minimize ringing during short moves.

      Is something like this possible? It seems like it would be rather easy to someone who is good with conditional coding.

      o_lampeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • o_lampeundefined
        o_lampe @br7408
        last edited by

        @br7408 My understanding is: we don't need IS on short moves, because due to the acceleration, we never reach the resonance speed.
        YMMV, because it's also related to jerk settings.

        br7408undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • br7408undefined
          br7408 @o_lampe
          last edited by

          @o_lampe I need to run a minimum jerk of 10 in order to print radials smoothly. I find it could come into play at short corner moves... That or even a way to reduce jerk on short moves. I doubt IS would fix it, as you say.

          Then again my only remaining issue with resonance is on the Y axis. I believe it is due to a tiny amount of belt stretch, as this is a big printer.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA