Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Low heating element current

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    5
    10
    173
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Estebanundefined
      Esteban
      last edited by

      Hello everyone,

      I'm experiencing a slight problem with the output current of my bed and hotend. Nothing alarming in the sense that they work and to my knowledge have always worked like that, but in the need to heat my machine much faster, I checked my amperages:

      • For the hotend = ~1.75A but connect to “out 1”.
      • For the bed = ~6.85A but connect to “out 0”.

      *to the current clamp

      My board is a Duet 3 Mini 5+, so I should be able to get 15Afor the board and 5A for the hotend. However, this is not the case. There's no limitation on my power supply (LRS-350-24 MeanWell), whether the elements are switched on separately or not, the values remain approximately the same.

      Where could the limitation come from? I don't have PWM limitation for my M307 controllers.

      M950 H0 C"out1" T0 ; create heater #0
      M143 H0 P0 T0 C0 S285 A0 ; configure heater monitor #0 for heater #0
      M307 H0 R2.43 D5.5 E1.35 K0.56 B0 ; configure model of heater #0
      M950 H1 C"out0" T1 ; create heater #1
      M143 H1 P0 T1 C0 S115 A0 ; configure heater monitor #0 for heater #1
      M307 H1 R2.43 D5.5 E1.35 K0.56 B1 ; configure model of heater #1
      
      jay_s_ukundefined infiniteloopundefined dc42undefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jay_s_ukundefined
        jay_s_uk @Esteban
        last edited by

        @Esteban maybe the rating of the bed and the hotend heater?

        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

        Estebanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Estebanundefined
          Esteban @jay_s_uk
          last edited by

          @jay_s_uk said in Low heating element current:

          maybe the rating of the bed and the hotend heater?

          For the trays, no, it's a 320W. As for the hotend, I confess I haven't tested it with more powerful heaters, but I'm pretty sure I have a 60W (Chinese, but normally not the cheapest of all).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • infiniteloopundefined
            infiniteloop @Esteban
            last edited by

            @Esteban

            There's no limitation on my power supply (LRS-350-24 MeanWell)

            It should provide up to 350W at 24V.

            For the trays, no, it's a 320W. As for the hotend, I confess I haven't tested it with more powerful heaters, but I'm pretty sure I have a 60W

            320W + 60W = what? More than the PSU is rated for. Steppers, MCU etc. come on top. "No limitations"? Think again.

            I checked my amperages:
            For the hotend = ~1.75A but connect to “out 1”.
            For the bed = ~6.85A but connect to “out 0”.
            to the current clamp

            There is no way to measure these properly with a multimeter. Improperly done, you even risk your board. Heaters are not fed with a static current. Instead, they have to be tuned to follow an optimised curve. Your M307 lines from the config don’t reflect any tuning - maybe that’s stored in the config-override.g though. To understand how tuning works, study Tuning the heater temperature control.

            Estebanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Estebanundefined
              Esteban @infiniteloop
              last edited by

              @infiniteloop
              No, everything has always gone smoothly. But if I max out at 6.8 * 24 = +/-160W and 1.7 * 24 = +/-40W, could that explain why there's no voltage drop?

              achrnundefined infiniteloopundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • achrnundefined
                achrn @Esteban
                last edited by

                @Esteban I would focus on whether your measurements are actually valid. In what situation did you take the measurement? Your H0 has no Q value, so at anything less than 100% duty (i.e. heater cold and on at full power) it's PWM at 250 Hz. Does your clamp meter measure accurately if it's a square wave at 250Hz? Even if it does, have you corrected for the less-than-100% duty?

                If you really want to measure the current personally I'd put the heater into bang-bang mode (B1 in the M307), connect an ammeter in series, and take the readings quickly as the heater element first heats up.

                Estebanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators @Esteban
                  last edited by dc42

                  @Esteban how does the size of the opening in your current clamp compared to the size of the wire you are clamping it round? Current clamp meters rely on the clamp capturing almost all of the magnetic field surrounding the wire. If the clamp opening is much larger than the wire then only some of the magnetic field from the wire will be captured by the clamp and it will under-read.

                  I suggest you use a multimeter to measure the resistance of the heaters (with power off of course), then apply power with full PWM and measure the voltage across each heater. From that you can calculate the current.

                  Bear in mind that some heater elements have positive temperature coefficients, so their resistance will rise and the current drop as they heat up.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  Estebanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Estebanundefined
                    Esteban @achrn
                    last edited by

                    @achrn
                    Non je n’ai changer aucun autre paramètre.
                    Pour ma pince, c'est une pince professionnel mais je ne trouve pas ses caractéristiques.
                    Je vais tacher de voir en contactant directement mon lit momentanément a l’alimentation pour vérifier mes résultats.
                    Et de modifier mon Gcode

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Estebanundefined
                      Esteban @dc42
                      last edited by

                      @dc42
                      C'est une pince relativement grand, environ 50mm de diamètre.
                      Je vais tacher de faire ces meusures

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • infiniteloopundefined
                        infiniteloop @Esteban
                        last edited by

                        @Esteban

                        if I max out at 6.8 * 24 = +/-160W and 1.7 * 24 = +/-40W, could that explain why there's no voltage drop?

                        Sure, but I doubt the measured values. Both @achrn and @dc42 have pointed out how to improve accuracy, but in the end, the Duet has to apply PWM to fine-tune the temperature of a heater, which might be the reason why your PSU can handle the load.

                        As soon as heaters arrive in PWM mode to regulate the current, they draw less power - on average. Cheap PSUs might be unable to deal with the spikes (that’s why ”Chinese Watts“ tend to deliver less ”bang” than you’d expect), but thanks to beefy capacitors and maybe some over-engineering, you are on the lucky side:

                        everything has always gone smoothly.

                        According to my static calculation (addition of nominal power requirements of all components), you are a bit over the limits, but as long as the voltage remains stable, there’s no reason to worry.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA