CoreXY setup problems with movement
-
Here is the result of M122 after performing some X and Y moves:
7:48:38 PMM122
=== Diagnostics ===
Used output buffers: 3 of 32 (14 max)
=== Platform ===
RepRapFirmware for Duet WiFi version 1.20 running on Duet WiFi 1.0
Board ID: 08DGM-95BNL-MGPSN-6JKDG-3SJ6M-T1Y3Y
Static ram used: 15448
Dynamic ram used: 99000
Recycled dynamic ram: 240
Stack ram used: 1392 current, 4504 maximum
Never used ram: 11880
Last reset 00:03:21 ago, cause: software
Last software reset at 2018-01-09 19:45, reason: User, spinning module GCodes, available RAM 11904 bytes (slot 2)
Software reset code 0x0003 HFSR 0x00000000, CFSR 0x00000000, ICSR 0x0441f000, BFAR 0xe000ed38, SP 0xffffffff
Error status: 0
Free file entries: 10
SD card 0 detected, interface speed: 20.0MBytes/sec
SD card longest block write time: 0.0ms
MCU temperature: min 31.9, current 32.5, max 32.7
Supply voltage: min 12.4, current 12.4, max 12.6, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0
Driver 0: standstill, SG min/max 0/62
Driver 1: standstill, SG min/max 0/187
Driver 2: standstill, SG min/max not available
Driver 3: standstill, SG min/max not available
Driver 4: standstill, SG min/max not available
Date/time: 2018-01-09 19:48:37
Cache data hit count 761373032
Slowest main loop (seconds): 0.155537; fastest: 0.000110
=== Move ===
MaxReps: 4, StepErrors: 0, FreeDm: 240, MinFreeDm 237, MaxWait: 113854ms, Underruns: 0, 0
Scheduled moves: 26, completed moves: 26
Bed compensation in use: none
Bed probe heights: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
=== Heat ===
Bed heaters = 0 -1 -1 -1, chamberHeaters = -1 -1
=== GCodes ===
Segments left: 0
Stack records: 1 allocated, 0 in use
Movement lock held by null
http is idle in state(s) 0
telnet is idle in state(s) 0
file is idle in state(s) 0
serial is idle in state(s) 0
aux is idle in state(s) 0
daemon is idle in state(s) 0
queue is idle in state(s) 0
autopause is idle in state(s) 0
Code queue is empty.
Network state is running
WiFi module is connected to access point
Failed messages: pending 0, notready 0, noresp 0
WiFi firmware version 1.20
WiFi MAC address 2c:3a:e8:0b:1e:c7
WiFi Vcc 3.40, reset reason Turned on by main processor
WiFi flash size 4194304, free heap 16336
WiFi IP address 192.168.10.131
WiFi signal strength -51dBm, reconnections 0, sleep mode modem
HTTP sessions: 1 of 8
Socket states: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Responder states: HTTP(1) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) FTP(0) Telnet(0) -
Why are your X and Y steps/mm different in the M92 command? Thet would normally be identical for a CoreXY printer.
-
They are different, because if they were the same, it was not accurate. So this way if I move 20mm, I get 20mm. They both stared at 320 steps/mm.
-
Also, when I had this printer running with a ramps 1.4 and mega 2560 setup, the steps were the same and I could print a calibration cube to within 0.02mm accuracy. So I don’t think it’s a printer setup issue.
-
We have a good number of CoreXY printer owners running with Duets, and none of them has had this type of issue before. AFAIK all of them are running with the same X and Y steps/mm. So I think the issue is either a new mechanical problem on your machine, or one of the following:
- Acceleration configured too high (M201)
- Maximum speed configured too high (M203)
- Jerk configured too high (M566)
- Motor current configured too low (M906)
However, I don't rule out a hardware problem, such as a partially failed driver chip on the Duet.
-
Both motors contribute to movement on a CoreXY. For pure X moves, both motors rotate in the same direction. For pure Y moves, the motors rotate in opposite directions. To get movement at 45 degrees, one motor will be stationary. Any other angle will require one motor to run at a different speed to another.
So it follows that, providing both motors have the same step angle (which they should) and both pulleys are the same size (which they should be) then the steps per mm must be set the same. If this results in some degree of angular movement, then one pulley must be rotating at a different speed to the other. So as well as the settings that David suggested you check, I'd also suggest you check that all the grub screws are tight, in case one or other pulley is slipping.
Edit. A 20 tooth pulley needs 80 steps per mm at 16x micro stepping so at 64 times micro stepping 320 steps per mm is correct.
2nd Edit. Or it could be that the belts aren't parallel to the axes but they would need to be a long way out and it would be a fundamental design\build fault that needs rectifying.
3rd Edit. The speed, acceleration, instantaneous speed change (jerk) and motor currents in the above config.g are all less than than my setting for my printer, so unless your moving mass is greater than my 2kg per gantry, then they should be fine.
-
I’ll see if I can clarify anything.
Before changing to the Duet board, I was using a ramps 1.4, an Arduino mega 2560 clone alone with A4988 drivers. The printer was able to print at 100mm/s accurately to within 0.02mm.
The only thing I changed was going to a Duet Wifi board. I ran the configurator and uploaded the files to the board through the web interface. I first started with default speeds and acceleration but I was having problems, so I changed to settings similar to my ramps setup, but it hasn’t helped.
At first I was getting almost 45 degree movements and as I changed microsteps and current, it got better and worse and better again.
For troubleshooting, I tried to loosen and tighten the belts, kept upping the current but stopped at 1600ma since these motors are rated at 1.68 amps. I also changed both X and Y motors, went through the microsteps and current changes and still no difference.Right now I have it at the closest it’s been. For 200mm of X movement, 10mm of Y movement happens also. Same if I move 200mm Y, I get 10mm X.
I’m leaning towards the board and might pull the board and put the ramps back in tonight to see what happens.
-
I really don't understand why you would ever need to reduce the steps/mm (from 320 to 298). A belt might move less than it is supposed to, if the pulley is loose or the motor loses steps. But if you reduced the steps/mm, that suggests the belt was moving more than it should have done, which isn't possible unless something else is pulling it as well as the motor.
-
I just reinstalled the ramps setup and confirmed that X and Y have the same steps in Marlin ( same firmware when it was installed before switching tnthecDuet board), they are each set at 80 steps/mm since it’s 16 microsteps. Just about to print a test cube, but all movements are the way they are supposed to. I command 200mm Y and I get 200mm Y with no X movement. Command 200mm X and I get 200mm X with no Y movement.
So that tells me there is something wrong with the DUET board. For some reason it's not driving the motors the way it's supposed to.
So a 50$ ramps 1.4/arduino mega 2560/A4988 clone setup performs great so far, not like the nearly 300$ CAD duet board.
Is this possibly a programming issue, even though it all appears correct, or is it possibly a defective board?
-
20mm test cube complete with the Ramps setup.
Printed at 100mm/s and all axis are within 0.03mm or less. I would say the printer is good mechanically.
Should i be contacting the dealer that sold me the board and return it?
-
you said that with the Ramps both X and Y steps are at 80 steps/mm at 16 micro steps so they are the same Yes or No
-
20mm test cube complete with the Ramps setup.
Printed at 100mm/s and all axis are within 0.03mm or less. I would say the printer is good mechanically.
Should i be contacting the dealer that sold me the board and return it?
It is possible that you have a defective stepper driver but I suggest you run the checks of motor movement that I linked to in my first post above, just to make sure that it isn't a configuration issue.
-
you said that with the Ramps both X and Y steps are at 80 steps/mm at 16 micro steps so they are the same Yes or No
With the Ramps setup, yes they are the same and everything works like it is supposed to. With the Duet board, NO, it wasn’t working with the steps the same.
-
It is possible that you have a defective stepper driver but I suggest you run the checks of motor movement that I linked to in my first post above, just to make sure that it isn't a configuration issue.
I went through that before joining the forum as part of the troubleshooting.
The one thing I didn’t do was to measure to see if it was actually diagonal by measuring. I was looking for general direction movement. Also when commanding just one axis to move, as in X +10, the X and Y both had movement.
-
It is possible that you have a defective stepper driver but I suggest you run the checks of motor movement that I linked to in my first post above, just to make sure that it isn't a configuration issue.
I went through that before joining the forum as part of the troubleshooting.
The one thing I didn’t do was to measure to see if it was actually diagonal by measuring. I was looking for general direction movement. Also when commanding just one axis to move, as in X +10, the X and Y both had movement.
I'm just a tad confused by that. When you run the G1 S2 commands that I linked to, they test each individual motor so movement should be at 45 degrees. You shouldn't need to measure anything to see if it's diagonal as it ought to be obvious. So when you run G91 then G1 S2 X10 F3000 what do you get in terms of X and Y movement (direction that is, not distance)? Also, what X and Y movement do you get when you run G91 followed by G1 S2 Y10 F3000?
-
It is possible that you have a defective stepper driver but I suggest you run the checks of motor movement that I linked to in my first post above, just to make sure that it isn't a configuration issue.
I went through that before joining the forum as part of the troubleshooting.
The one thing I didn’t do was to measure to see if it was actually diagonal by measuring. I was looking for general direction movement. Also when commanding just one axis to move, as in X +10, the X and Y both had movement.
I'm just a tad confused by that. When you run the G1 S2 commands that I linked to, they test each individual motor so movement should be at 45 degrees. You shouldn't need to measure anything to see if it's diagonal as it ought to be obvious. So when you run G91 then G1 S2 X10 F3000 what do you get in terms of X and Y movement (direction that is, not distance)? Also, what X and Y movement do you get when you run G91 followed by G1 S2 Y10 F3000?
I will have to reinstall the Duet Board to do it again.
I might not have time this evening to uninstall the ramps setup and install the Duet board and test. I will try though and report back here.
At least I was able to use my printer last night with the ramps setup, and see that mechanically, it is functioning properly.
I really hope it’s something simple in the programming and not a board issue. The web interface is nice and the motors are quieter.
Even the first board I used on this printer, a cheap Anet V1 board, worked great. It’s the parts printer I used for some parts.
-
…...................
I really hope it’s something simple in the programming and not a board issue. The web interface is nice and the motors are quieter.Yes it's a great board - both hardware and firmware. It's very unusual but not impossible that you may have a faulty stepper driver. In which case, you'll find that getting it replaced under warranty is no problem. The individual motor tests should help to prove if it's a driver. Might just be worth checking the wiring too. I understand that the printer works fine with your other board but it's not impossible that there might be a bad crimp in a connector that works in one position but not in another. Unlikely I know, but not impossible.
-
…...................
I really hope it’s something simple in the programming and not a board issue. The web interface is nice and the motors are quieter.Yes it's a great board - both hardware and firmware. It's very unusual but not impossible that you may have a faulty stepper driver. In which case, you'll find that getting it replaced under warranty is no problem. The individual motor tests should help to prove if it's a driver. Might just be worth checking the wiring too. I understand that the printer works fine with your other board but it's not impossible that there might be a bad crimp in a connector that works in one position but not in another. Unlikely I know, but not impossible.
I’m still using factory crimps on the cables I have. They have DuPont connectors on them for now and once I knew everything was working properly I was going to install the molex connectors.
One thing I forgot to mention, I did actually try other cables, since I have spares and was a quick test. So I doubt that 2-3 cables would have the same issue.One other thing. Is there a way I can wipe the configuration in there and reinstall it? Possible problem with the configuration file maybe? I guess. Could install a Cartesian setup and make a couple small moves then install a fresh configuration for CorrXY.
-
I’m still using factory crimps on the cables I have. They have DuPont connectors on them for now and once I knew everything was working properly I was going to install the molex connectors.
One thing I forgot to mention, I did actually try other cables, since I have spares and was a quick test. So I doubt that 2-3 cables would have the same issue.One other thing. Is there a way I can wipe the configuration in there and reinstall it? Possible problem with the configuration file maybe? I guess. Could install a Cartesian setup and make a couple small moves then install a fresh configuration for CorrXY.
Fair enough - as you say, it's unlikely to be a cabling issue. Nothing jumped out at me from your config.g but that's not to say I haven't missed anything. AFAIK, uploading a new config.g will overwrite anything that's there.
-
I would also point out that you should also delete your Config-overide file and maybe comment out the M501 at the end of your Config.g until you have this sorted?
Doug
