New firmware 2.0RC5 available

dc42

Upload errors are expected with the new firmware if you have a password set on your Duet (other than the default 'reprap') and you use DWC 1.21.

Please load DWC ~~1.21.4~~ 1.21.1RC4 on to your Duet, clear the browser cache, load it and immediately press control-shift-J to get the debugging console. Then when DWC becomes unresponsive, there may be an exception message.

Scachi

@dc42 said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

Upload errors are expected with the new firmware if you have a password set on your Duet (other than the default 'reprap') and you use DWC 1.21.

Please load DWC 1.21.4 on to your Duet, clear the browser cache, load it and immediately press control-shift-J to get the debugging console. Then when DWC becomes unresponsive, there may be an exception message.

1.21.4 ? Where do I get this version ? All I can find is 1.21.1RC4, I thought this was the latest

dc42

Sorry, I meant DWC 1.21.1RC4.

otaku521

Hi David,

On 2.0 RC5 now...
I noticed that in the web interface machine status that Z jumps up and down while printing.
I am on Layer Z 9.6, but it sometimes display goes to 10.6.. then back to 9.6 again...
(is it because of delayed display of Z hop?)

Can anyone double confirm on this?

dc42

@otaku521 said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

Hi David,

On 2.0 RC5 now...
I noticed that in the web interface machine status that Z jumps up and down while printing.
I am on Layer Z 9.6, but it sometimes display goes to 10.6.. then back to 9.6 again...
(is it because of delayed display of Z hop?)

Can anyone double confirm on this?

That's to be expected if you have configured 1mm Z-hop in your slicer. It won't happen if you use firmware retraction and configure Z hop in the M207 retraction settings

Catalin_RO

Did some machining today with 2.0RC5 and all was OK.

dc42

Chrishamm had just released Duet Web Control 1.21.1 so I've added it to the release area at https://github.com/dc42/RepRapFirmware/releases/tag/2.0RC5a. Anyone who was experiencing problems with DWC 1.21.1RC4, please try this new version.

Dr_Ju_Ju

Just updated both & running a print now...

FYI, I got around my Trinamic\board fan issues, by wiring the board fan in parallel (1 socket & 2 plugs) with the hot end fan, which was set to come on at the same'ish temperatures anyway...

kraegar

Been running on the RailCore nearly non-stop since you released it yesterday. Was previously on 2.0rc3, both have worked without issues that I've encountered. Turning out some fantastic prints.

zerspaner_gerd

@dc42 said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

Upload errors are expected with the new firmware if you have a password set on your Duet (other than the default 'reprap') and you use DWC 1.21.

Please load DWC ~~1.21.4~~ 1.21.1RC4 on to your Duet, clear the browser cache, load it and immediately press control-shift-J to get the debugging console. Then when DWC becomes unresponsive, there may be an exception message.

For me there was of course no change with DuetWebControl-1.21.1, too bad.

Why 1.21 runs smoothly, and with 2.0 and 1.21.1 DWC does not work at all? And the sporatic problem with the gcode files.

I have not set up a password.

Here is a video to clear the browser cache.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zs87rwetvx862hl/clear the browser cache.wmv?dl=0

Here are the results of debugging console:

crosshair.png:1 Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (page not found)
diabase_calibration_diagram.png:1 Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (page not found)
/rr_download?name=0:/sys/oem.json:1 Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (file not found)
dwc.js:2 GET http://192.168.188.40/rr_status?type=1 0 ()
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612
setTimeout (async)
success @ dwc.js:1456
u @ dwc.js:2
fireWith @ dwc.js:2
done @ dwc.js:2
(anonymous) @ dwc.js:2
load (async)
send @ dwc.js:2
ajax @ dwc.js:2
updateStatus @ dwc.js:612

Can someone try to upload this gcode file, these are not displayed on me with RRF 2.0RC5 + DWC 1.21.
Is this due to RRF or the gcode file.
0_1527096457013_960 Justier Teil fuer rund gleichmaessigkeit.gcode

BMMal

I'm having some strange under extrusion issue. Not sure how I started a print at all but I can see that my support is under extruded. The first layer of the part barely pushed out any plastic. I tested by trying to manually extrude 100mm of material and only about 40mm got extruded. I did this twice. Once by commanding a full 100 and then commanding 20mm 5 times.

~~I have to revert to 2b for now which did not have any issues that I noticed.~~

wilriker

@bmmal I can confirm this. I tried 100mm and 50mm extrusion and it did barely extrude less than 100mm altogether - that might also explain why my print today hat what I first thought was a layer shift. Now it rather makes sense that extrusion was so low that bed adhesion failed at one point, moved the print and gladly found hold again in a place where I did not have to toss the print away.

I will also downgrade to RC4 and check again.

EDIT: I retested and now can no longer reproduce the problem.

@BMMal how fast did you extrude? When I tried with 5mm/s it would fail most often. I tried again with 1mm/s and it extruded exactly 100mm on RC5.

denke

gcode file delete problem threw dwc:1.21.1, fw:2.0-rc4:
->http://printer.loc/rr_delete?name=0%3A%2Fgcodes%2Fvase.gcode
<-{"err":1}
Message displayed: Error: Cannot delete file 0:/gcodes/vase.gcode because it is open

There was no print or simmulation since cold bootup, just deleted a bunch of other gcode files.
After "emergency stop" the file deleted successfully.

BMMal

This post is deleted!

BMMal

@wilriker said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

@bmmal I can confirm this. I tried 100mm and 50mm extrusion and it did barely extrude less than 100mm altogether - that might also explain why my print today hat what I first thought was a layer shift. Now it rather makes sense that extrusion was so low that bed adhesion failed at one point, moved the print and gladly found hold again in a place where I did not have to toss the print away.

I will also downgrade to RC4 and check again.

EDIT: I retested and now can no longer reproduce the problem.

@BMMal how fast did you extrude? When I tried with 5mm/s it would fail most often. I tried again with 1mm/s and it extruded exactly 100mm on RC5.

I have to retest. I found a mechanical problem and suspect there may be another. Working on it.

wilriker

@bmmal said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

I have to retest. I found a mechanical problem and suspect there may be another. Working on it.

More or less the same here. Too fast extrusion speed plus a bad angle in my Reverse Bowden. Retested twice now and both times perfect 100mm extrusions.

BMMal

@wilriker said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

@bmmal said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

I have to retest. I found a mechanical problem and suspect there may be another. Working on it.

More or less the same here. Too fast extrusion speed plus a bad angle in my Reverse Bowden. Retested twice now and both times perfect 100mm extrusions.

Something is not adding up for me. I have tried both RC3 and RC5 and I'm getting half of what I should with both of them. I don't recall changing anything with my steps/mm or microstepping...

wilriker

@bmmal What speed are you testing with? For me 1mm/s works fine, 5mm/s did not reliably extrude the requested amount - at least not with the bad angle in my reverse bowden and a comparably weak ungeared extruder setup.

BMMal

@wilriker

1mm/s

Usually 5 is just on the edge of too fast.

wilriker

@bmmal said in New firmware 2.0RC5 available:

Usually 5 is just on the edge of too fast.

Found that out as well.