Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    OK to control PTC heaters using PID?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    2
    4
    1.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Marc Leeundefined
      Marc Lee
      last edited by

      Is it a good idea to control 220V PTC heaters heaters using PID (via an SSR obviously).
      E.g. like these ceramic PTC heaters:
      https://www.aliexpress.com/store/group/220V/508447_257834596.html?spm=2114.8147860.0.0.KQn4nw
      or these:
      https://www.aliexpress.com/store/group/220V/508447_258832837.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        I can't see any reason not to. RRF uses low frequency (10Hz) PID on the bed and chamber heaters so as to be compatible with all types of SSR.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Marc Leeundefined
          Marc Lee
          last edited by

          Thanks dc42. Is anyone else using PTC heaters for the bed and/or enclosure? Becasue the maximum temperature of PTC heaters is inherent in their construction, it seems this makes them safer than other heater options that rely on additional temperature sensors to stop thermal runaway. Is this correct logic?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            @Marc:

            Thanks dc42. Is anyone else using PTC heaters for the bed and/or enclosure? Becasue the maximum temperature of PTC heaters is inherent in their construction, it seems this makes them safer than other heater options that rely on additional temperature sensors to stop thermal runaway. Is this correct logic?

            I think that is good logic, provided that the heater can still reach the temperature you need in a reasonable time.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA