• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

OK to control PTC heaters using PID?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Duet Hardware and wiring
2
4
1.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Marc Lee
    last edited by 12 Feb 2016, 05:31 2 Dec 2016, 05:31

    Is it a good idea to control 220V PTC heaters heaters using PID (via an SSR obviously).
    E.g. like these ceramic PTC heaters:
    https://www.aliexpress.com/store/group/220V/508447_257834596.html?spm=2114.8147860.0.0.KQn4nw
    or these:
    https://www.aliexpress.com/store/group/220V/508447_258832837.html

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      dc42 administrators
      last edited by 2 Dec 2016, 08:13

      I can't see any reason not to. RRF uses low frequency (10Hz) PID on the bed and chamber heaters so as to be compatible with all types of SSR.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Marc Lee
        last edited by 7 Dec 2016, 23:56

        Thanks dc42. Is anyone else using PTC heaters for the bed and/or enclosure? Becasue the maximum temperature of PTC heaters is inherent in their construction, it seems this makes them safer than other heater options that rely on additional temperature sensors to stop thermal runaway. Is this correct logic?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          dc42 administrators
          last edited by 8 Dec 2016, 00:02

          @Marc:

          Thanks dc42. Is anyone else using PTC heaters for the bed and/or enclosure? Becasue the maximum temperature of PTC heaters is inherent in their construction, it seems this makes them safer than other heater options that rely on additional temperature sensors to stop thermal runaway. Is this correct logic?

          I think that is good logic, provided that the heater can still reach the temperature you need in a reasonable time.

          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          2 out of 4
          • First post
            2/4
            Last post
          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA