Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Any guesses as to discrepancy in arm length vs. measured arm length?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    13
    61
    9.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Jackalundefined
      Jackal
      last edited by

      Neither S6 and S8 would modify your arm length, are you sure your calibration routine is correct?
      Do you have other M665 in your config.g or config-override.g?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Jareryundefined
        Jarery
        last edited by

        no other M665 commands.
        I usually move any config override values to the main config file and delete the override.

        My delta may be out of square somewhere but not massively. All towers are square to the bed when using an 8" precision square.
        The end stops are within .3 of each other I believe. I can run though this again.
        The effector may have some tilt but not visual to the eye and no room for a level. Haydn carbon arms, all measured to 304mm, delrin ends, magball connections. All 6 pairs of magballs measured in width (of each pair set) to be within 0.1mm or so with calipers.

        Its not terrible if I use S6, I just find it odd that when I use S8 (or S9) it calculates and changes the L length of the rods to be something so far off.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • MiRundefined
          MiR
          last edited by

          One idea on your s8 values:

          my guess is that you did s9 calibration, put the values to config and then switched to s8, forgetting to replace the arm length with the correct length of 304.2

          As said above, s6 and s8 do not guess the arm length, you have to provide it as input.
          Also, run s8 (or s6) several times, it can take a number of runs until everything is dialed in, you will see at some point that the average deviation does not change much anymore. Then do M500 and copy the values over from config.override to config

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Jareryundefined
            Jarery
            last edited by

            @MIR yes you may be correct, I was using S9 at one point.

            I have been running 2 or 3 auto calibrations till the deviation amount converges.
            Thanks for the tips.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wwmotorsportsundefined
              wwmotorsports
              last edited by

              Sorry to dig up an old thread here, but I am fighting the same issues with my Rostock with all of the trick laser components.

              I eliminated the "ridges and valleys" in the bed mesh by upping my stepper current and lubricating the joints of the 300.15mm Trick Laser arms with some 50K diff lube for RC trucks. When I got that result, I was initially very excited, but with the ridges gone I could see the same three point high/low shape described by many other users across this forum.

              I have the components to build some new arms to whatever length I choose, but I am having a hard time deciding what length to go with as a compromise between a) getting a good bed leveling result and calibration via FSR by eliminating the effector tilt and b) having the arms become dangerously near vertical when getting near to the edge of the bed near a tower.

              Can anyone report further on the performance of their Rostock with longer arms? Have you had any trouble with being too close to vertical on the arms when near a tower?

              Thanks ahead of time!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators
                last edited by

                Having the arms go vertical or even beyond when printing close to a tower isn't a problem. What you need to avoid is arms going below about 20 degrees to the horizontal.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • wwmotorsportsundefined
                  wwmotorsports
                  last edited by

                  Perfect, that's exactly what I needed to know. Thanks!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wwmotorsportsundefined
                    wwmotorsports
                    last edited by wwmotorsports

                    As an interesting test before making the longer arms, I just reduced the calibration radius to 87.5mm and reduced the probing radius for the bed mesh correspondingly, and the results were pretty astounding. Previously, the best calibration I could get was roughly 0.18 deviation, and with no physical change the the printer, the deviation went down to 0.021!

                    The bed mesh in the smaller radius was also greatly improved. Linked below are the results of the bed mesh at a 140mm radius followed by the 87.5mm radius.

                    140mm Radius Bed Mesh

                    87.5mm Radius Bed Mesh

                    I will post my results when I change the rod lengths as well.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jmjcokeundefined
                      jmjcoke
                      last edited by jmjcoke

                      I have a trick laser frame and the mini trucks with Duet3d smart effector. I had to modify the pcb truck mounts to fit the trick laser parts. I am using the Hayden 360 arms and consistently calibrate at 0.035 @ 150mm radius. I happily give up the Z travel for being able to print a perfect first layer all the way to 300mm edge. I use the correct arm length and S6 and no G29 mesh.

                      Add: I think it is something to do with the spacing, 55mm between the arms provides more stability.

                      Joshua Coke

                      Trick Laser Metal Max with Smart Effector
                      Duet Wifi
                      Zesty Nimble
                      Mosaic Pallette+
                      At work
                      Renishaw AM250/400/ RenAM500M/500Q Powder Bed Fusion (Metal 3D Printers)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Nxt-1undefined
                        Nxt-1
                        last edited by

                        This thread seems to have died down, but have any of you found a definitive answer to the problems posed?

                        Duet3D and delta printer enthousiast. Buildlog
                        Looking for Duet3D configuration support, check out Nxt-3D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA