Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Improving auto-calibration.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    6
    26
    4.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Qdeathstarundefined
      Qdeathstar
      last edited by

      How can I get the probe to stop at its trigger?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DjDemonDundefined
        DjDemonD
        last edited by

        So the trigger height will be the same distance above the bed at each location but if your effector has tilted the nozzle to bed distance at the trigger height will be different. This difference is what you are measuring relative to the trigger height at bed centre where effector tilt should be zero. Your IR probe according to your config.g is pretty close to your nozzle so these will be small values.

        You are measuring the distance between the trigger height and the nozzle hitting the bed. So go to a coordinate, send G30 the head will descend and stop when triggered OR lower the head manually until the LED comes on, on the IR sensor board. Then manually lower until you grip a piece of paper or actually make contact with the bed whichever is easier to measure. Do this at bed centre, and each of the autocalibration probing points.

        H = (trigger height measured at the point) - (trigger height at the bed center)

        So enter for each of your points in bed.g the H value i.e.

        G30 P0 X0.00 Y110.00 Z-99999 H0
        G30 P1 X70.71 Y84.26 Z-99999 H0.3
        G30 P2 X108.33 Y19.10 Z-99999 H-0.4
        G30 P3 X95.26 Y-55.00 Z-99999 H-0.6

        See how you get on with that.

        Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
        www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
        PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • kraegarundefined
          kraegar
          last edited by

          I too likely need to add H values to my probe points. My main issue is with the variability of the test for when the nozzle is gripping a sheet of paper. There's some subjectivity there.

          What increments are you moving when you're calibrating those H values? 0.1mm, or lower?

          I'm also a bit confused about how you determine the H value. Do you do a paper test like is outlined for configuring Z0 in the IR Probe setup? (Move to that point, lower the head until it grips a sheet of paper, set that as Z0, move up 5mm, then probe and then subtract the height at the bed center from that new value?

          Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
          https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            @kraegar:

            I too likely need to add H values to my probe points. My main issue is with the variability of the test for when the nozzle is gripping a sheet of paper. There's some subjectivity there.

            What increments are you moving when you're calibrating those H values? 0.1mm, or lower?

            I'm also a bit confused about how you determine the H value. Do you do a paper test like is outlined for configuring Z0 in the IR Probe setup? (Move to that point, lower the head until it grips a sheet of paper, set that as Z0, move up 5mm, then probe and then subtract the height at the bed center from that new value?

            I use 0.025mm increments on my delta with 160 steps/mm. If you have 100 or 200 steps/mm then you should use 0.020mm instead. The procedure I use is:

            1. Move the head to over the probe point.

            2. Lower the head until it just grips a sheet of paper (this is where I use 0.025mm increments near the end).

            3. Send G92 Z0.

            4. Raise the head 5mm.

            5. Send G30 S-1 to lower the probe until it triggers.

            6. Read off the Z height in the web interface.

            I usually repeat steps 4-6 a few times to make sure the trigger height is consistent. The H parameter for each point is (trigger height at that point) - (trigger height at centre of bed).

            HTH David

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • kraegarundefined
              kraegar
              last edited by

              David, that's exactly what I was looking for - thank you!

              (You might consider adding those steps to the wiki for clear instructions on setting an H value for each point)

              Is there a way to set the web interface to jog at 0.020? I have the "half move rate" checked, which took it down to 0.05mm

              Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
              https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • StephenRCundefined
                StephenRC
                last edited by

                You could make a macro with a relative move. Something like this for going down:
                G91 ; relative moves
                G1 Z-0.020 ; go down a bit
                G90 ; absolute moves

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators
                  last edited by

                  @StephenRC:

                  You could make a macro with a relative move. Something like this for going down:
                  G91 ; relative moves
                  G1 Z-0.020 ; go down a bit
                  G90 ; absolute moves

                  That's exactly what I do, except I use 0.025mm because that is an exact number of microsteps on my printer.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • kraegarundefined
                    kraegar
                    last edited by

                    Mine's at 80 steps/mm

                    As an aside, I'm only calibrating down to 0.06 now, so hoping this makes a big improvement 🙂

                    Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
                    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Qdeathstarundefined
                      Qdeathstar
                      last edited by

                      When you say, "just gripping a piece of paper, is that until the paper can't move, or until we feel some resistance?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Qdeathstarundefined
                        Qdeathstar
                        last edited by

                        One thing i found out while doing this was that my endstops were loosely goosey… i tightened them up and now at least i can get repeatable results 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators
                          last edited by

                          @Qdeathstar:

                          When you say, "just gripping a piece of paper, is that until the paper can't move, or until we feel some resistance?

                          I lower the nozzle until i can feel a significant resistance. The important thing is to be consistent.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Qdeathstarundefined
                            Qdeathstar
                            last edited by

                            What do you guys think about my H-values… most of them are negative... i'd expect for them to be centered around zero, not mainly negative?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Jackalundefined
                              Jackal
                              last edited by

                              Qdeathstar, in what way does the auto calibration got worse?
                              Your H values seems ok to me, I am probing 32 points and my H values add up to 1.6
                              I don't think the effect of the end effector tilt would simply make them center around 0

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Qdeathstarundefined
                                Qdeathstar
                                last edited by

                                Sorry, i did not find the real trigger height, i subtracted z-values (which made the h-values the inverse of what they needed to be)… I think i have the issue fixed, im testing now. The z-height overall was a little low on the first go.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Jackalundefined
                                  Jackal
                                  last edited by

                                  Glad to hear you got it solved

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Qdeathstarundefined
                                    Qdeathstar
                                    last edited by

                                    well, i got that part of it solved but now it seems like the area across from the y tower is a little low and the area close to the y tower heading around to the z-tower is low…

                                    i'm wondering if i can make manual adjustments to the H values to dial it in?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dc42undefined
                                      dc42 administrators
                                      last edited by

                                      You should only use H corrections to compensate for actual variations in trigger height, which on a delta printer are usually caused by effector tilt. If you are still getting significant errors close to points that are included in the auto calibration bed probing, either fix the geometrical errors that are causing them, or use the new grid bed compensation in the 1.17dev6 build after auto calibration to compensate for them.

                                      I have it on my list to add a wiki page on delta calibration.

                                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Qdeathstarundefined
                                        Qdeathstar
                                        last edited by

                                        Thank you. Geometrical errors in this case are most likely to be a warped bed, correct? Or is there something else i should check?

                                        Also, should the nozzle hit the bed at z=0 for x=0 & y = 0? When i check there i got .25mm off the bed?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Qdeathstarundefined
                                          Qdeathstar
                                          last edited by

                                          actually, it turns out when i found out my endstops were loose, i never readjusted z=0….

                                          I redid the h-value test and now it's almost perfect!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dc42undefined
                                            dc42 administrators
                                            last edited by

                                            @Qdeathstar:

                                            Also, should the nozzle hit the bed at z=0 for x=0 & y = 0? When i check there i got .25mm off the bed?

                                            Yes it should be much closer to zero height than that. Perhaps your trigger height in the G31 command is not set correctly?

                                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA