Duet3D Logo

    Duet3D

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order

    Compensate for Z-Offset Inconsistencies?

    Tuning and tweaking
    leveling z-offset z-probe consistency
    5
    11
    692
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • IOIIOOO
      IOIIOOO last edited by

      Despite using mechanical bed auto leveling (with two independent Z steppers) and mesh bed leveling, I find the right side of my bed is "closer" to the nozzle than the left side as I print.

      After some investigation, I have found my z-offset to my probe is about .2-.3 mm less on the right side than the left side. I'm not sure why - I use a dual linear rail system so there is little to no "jog" in the head, but it's clearly happening as I believe the data.

      A thought occurred to me though - is there a way (or could there be a way) to take a series of known z-offset values and apply those to the mesh grid to compensate for z-offset inconsistencies? While such a process would take manual guidance at initial setup, it feel like it would take auto bed leveling to the next level as it would help with printers that are not 100% consistent in their build (much like how auto bed leveling itself helps with printers not 100% consistent in their build surface).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Veti
        Veti last edited by

        can you post a picture of your mesh bed level result?

        IOIIOOO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Phaedrux
          Phaedrux Moderator last edited by

          It sounds like you're describing effector tilt.

          https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer#Section_Adding_trigger_height_corrections_to_the_bed_g_file

          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

          IOIIOOO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • IOIIOOO
            IOIIOOO @Phaedrux last edited by

            @phaedrux Maybe! I’m going to check it out!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Veti
              Veti last edited by

              that is for delta printers.
              you might have a tilt as well but that wont work on Cartesian printers.

              IOIIOOO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • IOIIOOO
                IOIIOOO @Veti last edited by

                @veti said in Compensate for Z-Offset Inconsistencies?:

                that is for delta printers.
                you might have a tilt as well but that wont work on Cartesian printers.

                I was wondering about that as I was reading about it just now. I wonder why the equivalent isn't available for cartesian printers?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • IOIIOOO
                  IOIIOOO @Veti last edited by

                  @veti Here you go,

                  0_1557098370466_JCFT5.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • IOIIOOO
                    IOIIOOO last edited by

                    You can see this offset difference clearer in this photo. On the left side the line of the ring is very narrow, and on the right it's smooshed down into the glass. 0,0 is the upper right BTW.

                    0_1557098755029_IMG_3297.jpeg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Mike
                      Mike last edited by

                      What kind of probe are you using?

                      On a side note, I personally went from dual steppers to just 2 leadscrews off one belt and have been really happy with the result. IMO, independent steppers are only worth it if you have 3 of them and can have a rigid bed mount.

                      IOIIOOO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • IOIIOOO
                        IOIIOOO @Mike last edited by IOIIOOO

                        @mike BLTouch

                        I have it do a tilt level before each print just to be safe.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DocTrucker
                          DocTrucker last edited by

                          I have a similar problem with one of my Ormerods and hadn't considered nozzle axis to bed normal alignment or more the the point variation.

                          Thanks! I will focus on my custom with a v-slot x-arm from now on and 'fix' the sloppy x-carriage another time.

                          Alive: 1 Ormerodish machines. 1 Custom Cantilever. 3 P3Steel. 1 Ciclopish scanner. In build: 1 P3Steel. Controllers: 2 Duet 2 , 2 D0.6, 1 D0.8.5, 1 D3 v0.5, 1 RAMPS/DRV8825, 1 Uno/Scan Card.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA