Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Huge variation in inductive probe trigger height in X direction

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    2
    4
    300
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • nbGUundefined
      nbGU
      last edited by nbGU

      Hello,

      I have a Duet 2 wifi controlling my printer with a 5v inductive probe on a 3mm aluminium heatbed. My trigger height in the centre (X100) is 0.2mm, at X0 the trigger height is 0.036 and X200 0.36

      It is a cartesian printer, the bed is level to the best of my ability with feeler gauges on the 4 corners. My X gantry is horizontal measured to 2 decimal places on each Z axis with quality vernier calipers.

      What can cause such a variation in trigger height over the width of the bed?

      Ive tried with heaters on and heaters off. first layer is overly squashed on one side and not sticking on the other, running mesh bed leveling.

      Many thanks

      nbGUundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • nbGUundefined
        nbGU @nbGU
        last edited by

        @nbgu update:

        I found that my extruder bracket to the two linear rails (prusa style) has some play In the bearings. My sensor is offset 20mm from my nozzle. My X pulleys are too small so the top of the belt is slightly angled up to the carriage.

        At X0 the belt tension is effectively lifting the pinda probe so that the nozzle has to get closer to the bed for the probe to trigger

        At X200 the belt tension is effectively pulling the pinda probe down so that it triggers with the nozzle further from the bed.

        I will print a new X carriage and use bearings with less play and see if it fixes it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • droftartsundefined
          droftarts administrators
          last edited by

          Well done for diagnosing this! Can often be tricky. As you knew the bed was level physically (as you'd checked with feeler gauges), it can be frustrating when the electronics tell you something different. I'd tend to trust what I can see physically and turn off bed compensation, and just use the probe for homing in the middle.

          Ian

          Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

          nbGUundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • nbGUundefined
            nbGU @droftarts
            last edited by

            @droftarts I hadn't thought of just turning off mesh bed compensation... there was me just printing in the middle strip of my bed!

            I swapped the bearings out for some with a better fit just by rooting through by bag of spares to find the best ones and greatly improved the issue. Currently designing a new bracket for my Titan Aero to get the Z probe as close to 0 X offset as i can get.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA