Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Web Control
    6
    32
    2.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Former User?
      A Former User @charames
      last edited by

      @charames true, but, https://forum.duet3d.com/post/158859

      charamesundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • charamesundefined
        charames @A Former User
        last edited by

        @bearer Yikes. didn't know... just joined today.

        A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Phaedruxundefined
          Phaedrux Moderator
          last edited by

          I'm sure he would have appreciated the attention to detail.

          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Former User?
            A Former User @charames
            last edited by

            @charames no worries, just don't be surprised when there isn't a reply..

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • charamesundefined
              charames
              last edited by

              I was led to this thread while looking for information on issues related to network latency. It seems Duet is known to have frequent connection drop issues, but most of those threads seem to zone in on WiFi as the culprit. However, I am using a Maestro on a wired link and experience connection drops if I connect over the internet (as opposed to locally on my network). Conclusion: latency seems to play a role. Mine was suitably functional after I played around with the "communication settings" (update interval=800mS). But, then I updated the UI to version 2.0.7 and started seeing disconnects again (this time with a message: “Connection interrupted, attempting to reconnect”). I have tried adjusting the Communication Settings since that worked for version 1.22.6, but no values that I have tried have made it any better. It still works well when connected locally, but the additional latency of the internet makes the connection unusable.

              I can click on the “Revert to DWC1” link and it suddenly works again. My conclusion is that there is something about the 2.0.7 build that is even more latency sensitive than DWC1 was.

              I know this isn't the right thread for this discussion, but "latency" is what brought me here. I'll continue searching.

              A Former User? Phaedruxundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Former User?
                A Former User @charames
                last edited by

                @charames said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

                Conclusion: latency seems to play a role.

                interesting, poor wifi signal can also result in increased latency

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Phaedruxundefined
                  Phaedrux Moderator @charames
                  last edited by

                  @charames It may be worth upgrading to RRF 3.1.1 and DWC 3.1.1 to test with recent code. @chrishamm would be the one to understand/explain the latency thing I think?

                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                  charamesundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • charamesundefined
                    charames @Phaedrux
                    last edited by charames

                    @Phaedrux said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

                    RRF 3.1.1 and DWC 3.1.1

                    I'll look into that, but I was under the impression that those updates introduced some significant changes that would require that I re-do all of my configs. Maybe its worth doing, but since I ONLY have connection issues as a complaint, I was looking for a solution for that.

                    A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Former User?
                      A Former User @charames
                      last edited by

                      @charames said in Communication directly via TCP (without using HTTP):

                      hose updates introduced some significant changes that would require that I re-do all of my configs.

                      yes-ish but now that 3.1.1 is seemingly stable it'll probably be worth while.

                      charamesundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Phaedruxundefined
                        Phaedrux Moderator
                        last edited by

                        https://configtool.reprapfirmware.org/Start

                        The configuration tool has support for 3.1.1 now so getting a compatible basic config isn't as complicated as it once was. If you have some more complex features implemented you'd still have to do that manually, but it's generally just some minor syntax changes. The gcode wiki is your friend here. https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode

                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                        charamesundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • charamesundefined
                          charames @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @bearer Thanks. I think I'll take the leap.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • charamesundefined
                            charames @Phaedrux
                            last edited by

                            @Phaedrux You, too... thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • magnets99undefined magnets99 referenced this topic
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA