Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    3.2b3: XY stalls when bed compensation activated

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    4
    12
    492
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TypQxQundefined
      TypQxQ
      last edited by

      I did run M122 while printing with bed compensation enabled and the "comp offset" is allways 0.000. Is that normal?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator
        last edited by

        It's common to experience this when a low Z jerk is set, to the point there is an entry for it in the mesh compensation documentation.

        https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Using_mesh_bed_compensation#Section_Troubleshooting

        Try increasing your Z jerk. M566 Z100

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        TypQxQundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TypQxQundefined
          TypQxQ @Phaedrux
          last edited by TypQxQ

          @Phaedrux tried even M566 Z500 and was no diffrence.
          I reasoned that if it would be from xy moving to fast for z, then why would it be worse at a slower xy speed?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TypQxQundefined
            TypQxQ
            last edited by

            Feels like I've tried everything now.
            XY loses steps regardless what I do to the acc, jerk and speed.
            Even raising the currents by 30%.

            M203 X18000 Y18000	; Max speed 300mm/s
            
            M203 Z24
            M201 Z1000
            M566 Z1000
            
            M201 X500 Y500
            M566 X300 Y300
            G1 F12000
            

            I've tried this too with my finger on emergency reset..:

            M203 Z100
            M201 Z1000
            M566 Z1000
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Phaedruxundefined
              Phaedrux Moderator
              last edited by

              Two things I would check.

              First see if there is any other Z jerk M566 command in another macro that is getting called. homeall or the like.

              You can also send M566 during the test to get a read back of the current value, just to double check it's not actually getting changed.

              The other thing would be to copy your config and macro files over to a new SD card and get it setup for standalone operation without the SBC. If the problem goes away then we've narrowed it down to DSF.

              https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Getting_Started_With_Duet_3#Section_Running_in_standalone_mode

              Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

              chrishammundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • chrishammundefined
                chrishamm administrators @Phaedrux
                last edited by chrishamm

                @Phaedrux There will be a fix for jerky movements in SBC mode in the next 3.2-b3+1 release. It won't take much longer before we release it.

                @TypQxQ please check out this post.

                Duet software engineer

                TypQxQundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • TypQxQundefined
                  TypQxQ @chrishamm
                  last edited by

                  @chrishamm Upgraded to ” RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 MB6HC version 3.2-beta3+3-ch running on Duet 3 MB6HC v0.6 or 1.0 (SBC mode)” and looks like it fixed both the missed stepps and the stuttering.

                  Ran the macro above and runs well even at 500mm/s.

                  Doing a multitool testprint now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • TypQxQundefined
                    TypQxQ @chrishamm
                    last edited by

                    Thanky @chrishamm!
                    It works great now!!!
                    16C3393D-4E95-4164-9F9F-5B7650783FC2.jpeg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • TypQxQundefined
                      TypQxQ @chrishamm
                      last edited by

                      @chrishamm Do you know if the new changes from ”3.2-beta3+3-ch” are included in the new ”3.2beta3.2” beta?
                      Didn’t see it in the changelog.

                      chrishammundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chrishammundefined
                        chrishamm administrators @TypQxQ
                        last edited by

                        @TypQxQ Yes, those changes have been merged into the new beta as well.

                        Duet software engineer

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA